100% (1)
Pages:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 3.6
Topic:

ECL 308W Discussion Post 2

Essay Instructions:
Write ONE PARAGRAPH, thank you! Only use the pdf I give you for the source, please. In other words, no reading or other research outside of class materials is expected. However, if you do choose to do any outside research or reading for them, including using any kind of artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT), you must fully and accurately acknowledge your sources, PLEASE REMEMBER TO put quotation marks around any wording that is not your own; if you don't do this, it is considered plagiarism for which there are severe penalties. I didn't get full points last time because of this, the teacher is really hard. THANK YOU! And for work cited, can you put it like this please: Eagleton, Terry. “Introduction: What Is Literature.” Literary Theory An Introduction, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2008, p. 12 Prompt: Eagleton complains of F.R. Leavis, his wife Q.D. Leavis, and their critical journal Scrutiny (launched in 1932) that “there was never any serious consideration of actually trying to change…society.” (p 29). Do you think that Eagleton's complaint is reasonable, or do you think that it's wrong of Eagleton to assume that it's everyone's responsibility to try to change society?
Essay Sample Content Preview:
ECL 308W Discussion Post 2 Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Professor’s Name Date In Literary Theory: An Introduction, Terry Eagleton objects to the scope of F.R. and Q.D. Leavis set out about moral critique through their journal Scrutiny, launched in 1932. Eagleton claims that "there was never any serious consideration of actually trying to change…society" (Eagleton, 2011). Eagleton here seems to object that the Leavis’ didn't take up the broader implications of their literary criticism but instead ignored the possible relevance given to them as a contribution to broader social and political concerns. In this sense, Eagleton's critique is that the Leavis’ missed their chance to cre...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!