Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal. Literature Essay
In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:
Background
Problem statement
Purpose of the change proposal
PICOT
Literature search strategy employed
Evaluation of the literature
Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created
Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Rubric
Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Background
Background section is not present.
Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Problem Statement
Problem statement is not present.
Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Change Proposal Purpose
Purpose of change proposal is not present.
Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %PICOT
PICOT is not present.
PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Literature Search Strategy
Literature search strategy is not present.
Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Literature Evaluation
Literature evaluation is not present.
Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2)
Theory utilization is not present.
Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2)
Implementation plan is not present.
Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3)
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2)
Appendices are not present.
Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding.
Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
10.0 %Evidence of Revision
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Date:
Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal
Introduction
People with serious mental illness (SMI) are involved in criminal activities at a higher rate compared to any other population. Today, in spite of being a superpower, the United States is the leading country in incarceration activities at the global level. Incarceration isolates people from the rest of population and creates an economic burden to the rest of population. Both developed and developing countries are still struggling with necessary interventions in reducing incarceration rates. While scholars are yet to come up with the main cause of SMIs, there is an urgent need to intervene on how the correction system handles repeat offenders. Repeat offenders have psychological problems that require the attention of correctional nurses. However, in the recent past, there have been cases where non-correctional nurses have been employed to care for and treat people with SMIs. The main concern is on whether non-correctional nurses have viable skills to handle and treat SMIs. Scholars have spent a great deal of time and resources in investigating the efficacy of non-correctional nurses in transformation of SMIs. The present study will investigate the role of non-correctional nurses in handling of SMIs.
Background
People with serious mental illness deserve similar attention that their counterparts in other health facilities receive (Gill & Murphy, 2017). There has been an increasing concern in the recent past on the diversion of SMIs to facilities with non-correctional nurses. The concern has been on whether the number of incarcerated SMIs is reduced or whether these individuals are rearrested fewer times compared to those that are left in facilities with correctional nurses. In any decision that the government and the society makes, there is a concern that SMIs pose a significant threat to the society at large. While there is a possibility that the whole population may not be affected directly by the activities of repeat offenders, the economic burden that repeat offenders pose on the justice system costs taxpayers a great deal of resources. Additionally, the use of non-correctional nurses or nurses who were hired without certification in the handling and treatment of SMIs raises concern on not only public safety, but also the nurses that interact with these individual in non-correctional facilities. One cannot ignore that congestion of jail facilities raises a need for diversion of repeat offenders, but at the same time, there has been a suitable mechanism to tackle this problem (Bryant, 2013). There has to be an improvement in delivery of service and care to all individuals with SMIs. The present study will expose the weakness of diverting people with SMIs to health facilities that do not have certified nurses or correctional nurses. The study will meet this objective by reviewing existing literature on the topic and propose an implementation in the justice system to help people with SMIs. The potential beneficiaries of this study are scholars researching on this topic, the families of people with SMIs, and anyone interested in this topic.
Problem statement
Patients with psychological mental illnesses are repeatedly arrested and jailed. The problem is that the justice system has come up with diversion programs that take people with SMIs to health facilities with nurses who were recruited without certification in correctional facilities. After completing sentencing, these individuals are released to the society and they are arrested again for criminal offences. The cycle continues throughout their lifetime. Non-correctional nurses or nurses that were employed without certification do not add psychological value to lives of incarcerated people with SMIs. As a result, it is impossible for the justice system to eradicate, leave alone reducing the prevalence of incarcerated SMIs.
Purpose of change proposal
The purpose of this proposal is to establish changes in the approach used to handle incarcerated inmates with SMIs. The proposal seeks to explore the impact of uncertified nurses on the incarcerated individuals that are diverted to health facilities with these nurses. It is expected that the study will identify the weakness of putting repeat offenders with SMIs in hands of nurses that are not trained to work in correctional facilities. The study seeks to help the society and stakeholders in clinical setting and the justice system rethink their role in behavioral change and consider emphasizing the urgency of concentrating in providing quality care to violent offenders with SMIs.
PICOT
Patients with SMIs are repeatedly arrested and jailed due to poor nursing services they receive in non-correctional environment. The PICOT statement for this study is that the patient population (P) subjected to care by non-correctional nurses (I) as the primary intervention (C) leading to the clinical problem (O) in the effectiveness of the practice in reducing the risk of assessed violence and time. This PICOT statement is comparative in nature in the sense that it will compare the quality of service and care that people with SMIs receive under non-correctional nurses to the anticipated outcome in behavior change.
Literature search strategy employed
Standard search strategy of literature will be used in this study. The strategy will target medical databases and Google scholar. The researcher will search the databases using key words like “incarceration and non-correctional nurses, Nurses dealing with serious mental illness people.” Resulting literature articles will be tabulated basing on their year of publication and author profiles. Only articles between 2010-2017 will be selected for the study.
Evaluation of the literature
The review of literature will be the main reason to find relevant resources for this study. The articles wi...