Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:
Answer the following questions
Essay Instructions:
Question of Meaning
2. SUMMARIZE the background and the way of life that produced Robert E. Lee; then do the same for Ulysses S. Grant. According to Catton, what ideals did each man represent?
3. In the historian's view, what essential traits did the two men have in common? Which trait does Catton think most important of all? For what reason?
Question on Writing Strategy
2. What EFFECT does the writer achieve by setting both his INTRODUCTION and his CONCLUSION in Appomattox?
3. For what reasons does Catton contrast the two generals before he compares them? Suppose he had reversed his outline, and had dealt first with Grant's and Lee's mutual resemblances. Why would his essay have been less effective?
4. Closely read the first sentence of every paragraph and underline each word of phrase in it that serves as a TRANSITION. Then review your underlinings. How much COHERENCE had Catton given his essay?
Essay Sample Content Preview:
ROBERT LEE AND ULYSSES GRANT
Name:
Grade Course:
Tutor’s Name:
(13, October, 2010)
Answer the following questions
According to Catton (1986), the background that produced Robert Lee and Ulysses Grant seemed to have influenced what each held. Lee was brought up in a family, culture and tradition in which graciousness was the order of the day. He embodied a life style that was similar to that which had gone through knighthood and the English squire. Although America believed that all men are equal; Lee thought it will be of an advantage to have some inequality with a society. A leisure class will emerge bring forward a class of men who can be leaders
On the other hand, Grant a son of a tanner was brought up in a tough way. He held nothing other than eternal toughness and sinewy fiber of men who grow beyond the mountains. He grew up holding respect as well as curtsy to no one that were self-reliant to a fault that didn’t care a lot about the past but was much concerned about the future.
Grant had a wider perspective of issues; he stood for the better of the entire country, seeking economic growth and development. He believed in an acute–dollar and cent stake. His fate was inclined to the country’s destiny, Grant believed in change as it will better living standard of his people. Business was key, accessibility in terms of having good infrastructure account to his success (Catton, 1986).
Lee on the other hand saw himself in the context of his own region. To him change was the biggest enemy and he could do anything to keep it at bay. He was of the idea that land is the chief source of wealth and influence.
According to Catton (1986), both Lee and Gr...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: