Exploring the Compatibility of Christianity with Extraterrestrial Life
In this week’s lecture, you were introduced to Thomas Paine’s point of view with regard to the plurality of the worlds. As was discussed during the lecture, Paine saw a deep irreconcilable conflict between Christianity and the existence of extraterrestrials and believed that one cannot believe in both. We also discussed Thomas Chalmers’s response to Paine. 1. Do you believe Chalmers’s response really did justice to Paine’s objection? In your opinion what is the major shortcoming(s) of Chalmers’s response? Hint: we discussed this briefly in class (you should respond to this in one to two paragraph of 300-400 words in total) 2. In your opinion, do you think Paine’s argument is still valid today? Before arguing your point of view, please carefully read the article in the next few pages, published in New York Times in 2008. Discuss whether you are content with Chalmers’s response or a modern version of it given by the Jesuit Jose Funes. (your answer must be 400-500 words).
Exploring the Compatibility of Christianity with Extraterrestrial Life
Student Name
University
Course
Professor Name
Date
Exploring the Compatibility of Christianity with Extraterrestrial Life
The historical origins of the controversy pertaining to the compatibility of Christianity and the existence of extraterrestrial life are profound, as Thomas Paine and Thomas Chalmers espoused opposing perspectives. According to Paine, the theological challenge was presented by the Bible's doctrines on the uniqueness of Earth and humanity, as well as its omission of extraterrestrial life.
Chalmers's Response to Paine's Objection
Thomas Chalmers' answer to Thomas Paine's complaint about whether Christianity could be compatible with life on other planets makes a big mistake by oversimplifying how faith and scientific progress interact. Chalmers says that the fact that the Bible does not directly talk about alien life means that it could exist without causing religious problems. But this method deals with something other than the bigger religious issues that Paine brought up (The New York Times, 2008). Paine's argument goes beyond Bible literality. It contradicts Christian beliefs that individuals are special and that Earth is God's most significant creation.
Chalmers' reliance on biblical silence as an answer ignores the deep theological implications of the idea that intelligent