The Business Judgment Rule
follow the grading rubric and also use the concepts from chapter 21.
CHAPTER 21: KEY CONCEPTS AND TAKEAWAYS
I need to understand what is involved in the incorporation process and the related requirements for a company to incorporate a business.
I need to understand the pros and cons of the corporate form as compared to other types of businesses.
I need to understand the difference between a domestic and foreign corporation.
I need to understand the duties that management owes to the corporation and shareholders.
I need to understand the Business Judgment Rule and when it applies.
Management Duties
Fiduciary Duty
Owed by officers and directors to the corporation and shareholders
Relationship is one of trust
Two key aspects
Duty of Loyalty:
Duty to avoid self dealing
Duty to share corporate opportunity (i.e., not to take it on the side for yourself)
Duty of Care:
a duty to act in the best interests of the corporation, and
to use the same level of care that an ordinarily prudent person would use in a similar situation
Business Judgment Rule (BJR)
Rule: If fiduciary duties met, courts will not:
Second guess good faith business decisions, or
Hold managers personally liable for any harm that results
Main Goals:
Allows managers to do their jobs
Keeps judges out of corporate management
Encourages directors to serve
Under the BJR, Managers are NOT Liable for Decisions Made:
In good faith
For a lawful purpose
Without a conflict of interest
To advance the best interests of the corporation
With the care that an ordinarily prudent person would take in a similar situation
The case’s facts reveal that Maynard Jenkins did not participate in the fraud in CSK Auto, Inc. As a result, the CEO is not legally responsible for this crime despite its occurrence under his watch for several reasons. For instance, the charter emphasizes that a company cannot hold these individuals financially liable unless they have a proof directly linking them to fraud. According to Block et al. (1998), corporate directors, the business judgment rule only finds the manager responsible when one fails to satisfy the duty of loyalty and care. Such scenarios include acting unlawfully and advancing selfish interests. Jenkins does not participate in such misconduct, which absorbs him of any wrongdoing on the duty of care and loyalty. Although the CEO is not responsible, exempting him from the criminal charges, he is liable for the losses incurred by the company. According to Cooper et al. (2012), despite CEOs failing to participate in a fraud crime directly, t...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
A Characteristic of Kant’s Good Will
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
-
Euthanasia is Ending One’s Life to Reduce Pain and Suffering
1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |
-
Social, Political, and Organizational Behavior Influencing Change
3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | APA | Law | Essay |