100% (1)
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
APA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 18
Topic:

What does a terrorist look like?

Essay Instructions:
Describe your chosen historical topic. You should address each of the following: What historical topic did you choose? What historical events are related to this topic? When did the events related to the historical topic occur? Who was involved in the events related to this topic? Whose voices or perspectives have been overlooked or minimized? Identify at least three sources related to your selected topic that you will use for your paper. At least one must be a primary source. Part Two: Background of the Topic In this section, you will examine the historical background of a particular narrative or discourse relevant to your topic, particularly voices or perspectives that have been overlooked or minimized. Here, keep in mind that your mission in the next section will be to deconstruct and critique the narrative. Describe the types of sources that were used to create the most common narrative surrounding the topic. You should address each of the following: What types of media were used to broadcast information about the event as it was occurring? What types of media were used to publicize the event after it had occurred? Describe the context of the sources you chose about your chosen topic. You should address each of the following: Are they primary sources or secondhand interpretive accounts? How is the content in the sources presented? Do the writers appear to “take sides” or simply give facts? Explain the components of the narrative of your topic. You should address each of the following: How was the topic portrayed in media as it was unfolding? How has media portrayed your topic at different points along the historical timeline since? What information or perspectives could have been presented about your topic but were not? Apply a historical perspective to provide a context for your selected topic. You should address each of the following: What other historical events were unfolding at the same time as your chosen topic? What other sociocultural historical factors have an impact on how your topic is represented in your selected sources? Determine the validity of the traditional historical narrative of the topic. You should address each of the following: How does factual information about your topic affect how the historical narrative is portrayed? Do the facts reinforce the information highlighted in the narrative? How has the narrative around your topic changed as new information has been discovered? Part Three: Deconstructing the Historical Narrative In Part Three, you will actively deconstruct the historical narrative concerning your topic and determine the overall validity of the narrative. Your objective here is to write a new narrative that provides a more holistic, inclusive version of history. Determine the credibility of the sources you selected for your chosen topic. You should address each of the following: How do you determine credibility for the sources you chose? Does it vary from source to source? Describe potential bias in your selected sources for your chosen topic. You should address the following: How do an author’s beliefs and agenda impact the information they present in their account? Identify the power structures that influence the development of the historical narrative surrounding your chosen topic. You should address each of the following: Who held the power in society when events related to your topic took place? Who benefits from the traditional version of the story? Explain why there are variations in the narrative of the event presented by your selected sources. You should address the following: How do your selected sources present information about the topic in varied ways? What information is presented in some sources but omitted in other sources? Explain why information gaps occur in the sources you selected for your chosen topic. You should address each of the following: Why was information included or excluded about this topic in your selected sources? What purpose does this serve? When new information about an event related to the topic came to light, was there any opportunity for your selected sources to include or correct excluded information in what they originally presented? Part Four: Changing the Narrative of History In this final section, you will reflect on your own lived experience and explore various components in the interpretation of history. A successful paper will make the connections between the historical context of the event as it was taking place and how that context may have changed in the time since the event occurred. Discuss the impact of historical context on your topic. Explain the historical context of the traditional narrative associated with your topic. Explain the importance of diverse perspectives in the interpretation of this topic. You should address each of the following: How were diverse perspectives included in the traditional narrative of your topic? How are new and more diverse perspectives being incorporated? How do incorporating these new and more diverse perspectives help you think about your own lived experiences? Describe the role of bias in the historical interpretation of this topic. You should address each of the following: How did bias affect the interpretation of this topic at the time of the event? How does bias affect the current interpretation of this topic? Explain how cultural norms and values impact the interpretation of this topic. You should address each of the following: What impact did cultural norms and values have on the interpretation of an event when it first occurred? How have cultural norms and values changed over time relating to the interpretation of this event? Explain the connection between your historical topic and current events. You should address each of the following: What is the connection between your topic, related past events, and current events? What are connections between your topic and your own life experiences? What to Submit Submit your paper as a four- to five-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins, not including title page or headers. Use at least three sources from the Shapiro Library, remembering that one of them must be a primary source. Sources should be cited according to APA style. You will continue with your approved topic from the beginning of the course. The body of the essay must be a MINIMUM of Four (4) full pages. Anything less will be returned to you. Answer ALL PARTS OF THE PROMPTS. There are Four (4) sections. If you need to copy/paste the prompts to keep you on track, that is fine, but please note that your minimum page count will increase by at least 2 pages. I will not go “searching” for answers. Make sure they are clear. Utilize APA in-text citations every place you give researched information and after all quotes. You must have an APA-formatted cover page and reference section on a separate page at the end. I sent out a template earlier in term. The format must be a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins, not including title page or headers. Use at least THREE (3) sources from the Shapiro Library, remembering that one of them must be a primary source. Your secondary sources should be books, academic journal articles, and websites that are experts in their fields. Stay away from tertiary sources (encyclopedias). Write in the third person unless the prompt SPECIFICALLY asks you for your personal opinion or lived experience.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
What Does A Terrorist Look Like? Name Institution Course and Code Professor Date What Does A Terrorist Look Like? Introduction The topic “What Does a Terrorist Look Like” is fascinating and stood out since many people are confused when it comes to the identification of who should be called an extremist or not. The majority of individuals perceive individuals from specific religions, cultures, races, or geographical locations to be terrorists, which shows a biased perception. For example, it is wrong to generalize that Muslims are extremists because one of them was caught in a terror act. Similarly, it is unfair to say that people from the Middle East are likely to be terrorists. This paper focuses on the significance of identifying actual terrorists without having a biased perception. Part One: Topic History Selected Historical Topic Topic Chosen The topic I selected is “What Does a Terrorist Look Like.” People need to understand that they should avoid being biased when identifying extremists since not all Muslims or individuals from the Middle East can be said to be terrorists. Despite the presence of numerous definitions of the word terrorist, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) defines a terrorist as someone or group of people who engages in criminal or violent acts with the intention of hurting others. Historical Events There exist numerous historical events related to terrorism, including the 9/11 attacks and the Orlando shooting. When such incidents occur, several terrorist groups claim to have been involved, such as Al Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Events Occurrence For example, the 9/11 attacks took place on 11th September 2001, when Flight 11, 77, 175, and 93 were hijacked by jihadists. In addition, the Orlando shooting incident took place on 12th June 2016, when Omar Mateen, a 29-year-old, shot people at a gay nightclub, killing 49 individuals and leaving over 53 people injured in Orlando, Florida. Individuals Involved In both the terror incidents stated above, individuals claiming to be sent by specific terrorist organizations were involved. These events appear to have been well-planned before their occurrences. Perspectives Overlooked The overlooked perspectives when it comes to terrorism are individuals from a specific geographical location, religion, or race. People seem to forget that a terrorist might be anyone from any racial group, location, or religion. Three Sources Used Primary Source: McVeigh, T. (2001, May 6). The McVeigh letters. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/may/06/mcveigh.usa. Secondary Source: O’Brien, L. (2019). The Evolution of Terrorism Since 9/11. FBI: Law Enforcement Bulletin. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/the-evolution-of-terrorism-since-911. Secondary Source: вЂЊMoore, J. (2017, September 11). The New Era: How Terrorism Has Changed Since The 9/11 Attacks. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/new-era-how-terrorism-has-changed-911-attacks-661716. Part Two: Topic Background Types of Sources Used Types of Media Used to Broadcast Information The narrative about Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, was broadcast by newspapers, television, radio stations, and magazines (McVeigh, 2001). Types of Media Used to Publicize The information related to McVeigh’s terrorist acts was publicized in the newspapers, magazines, and journals. Indeed, it was spread to a broad audience locally and internationally. Sources Contexts Primary or Secondary Sources Primary and secondary sources were used to broadcast and publicize the information. Some of the sources, such as The Guardian, revealed what was behind McVeigh’s bombing action, which he said was equivalent to bombing a building of the government in Iraq and Serbia among other countries (McVeigh, 2001). Content Representation The content was presented in a neutral way and the writers did not take any side. Instead, they represent the information the way it was, which involved the city bomber’s narration of why he did it. Narrative Components Topic Portrayal in the Media The media portrayed the topic as a terrorist act and was trying to look for any association of the terror act with a larger group of extremists. Topic Portrayal at Different Points At different points, the media depicted that McVeigh might have been sent by a large terrorist organization. In other instances, the media focused on the reasons that the terrorist chose to bomb the Oklahoma building and not any other building at a different location. Information Presented Some of the information that would have been presented but was not, was who sent McVeigh to bomb the Oklahoma building and what the message being sent to the United States (US) government. Historical Perspective Historical Events Unfolding News about terrorism targeting the US was being discussed during the time of the Oklahoma building bombing. Sociocultural Historical Factors The socio-cultural historical factors that impacted how the topic or narrative was presented include religious beliefs, language, social classe...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!