Comparative Analysis of Two Publications: Settings, Sources, Arguments, and Consequences
Please follow the instructions below and use the two sources i gave. This assignment consists in a comparative analysis of two primary sources of your choosing – taken from the first half of the course (lectures 1 through 12). The paper should be 3 pages long (≈ 750 words, double-spaced). 1. Pick two primary sources (see below) -- if possible, choose two sources that are similar -- then it will be easier to compare/contrast them.
2. Read the sources.
3. Although these papers are relatively short, they should be structured like any self-respecting university-level essay -- i.e.,: a) Introduction, b) Part 1 c) Part 2 ... etc. d) Conclusion.
4. When writing the paper, remember to include a couple of quotes.
PLEASE USE THE TWO SOURCES I HAVE PUT UNDER HERE ARE THE LINKS
https://germanhistorydocs(dot)ghi-dc(dot)org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=850
https://www-jstor-org(dot)ezproxy(dot)library(dot)yorku(dot)ca/stable/pdf/10.14321/jstudradi.9.1.0001.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A3c00ca4fdf5a32798d780362680b3584&ab_segments=&origin=&initiator=
Comparative Analysis of Two Articles
Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
Scholars, activists, and politicians from various backgrounds and eras have been interested in youth subculture and political action. This paper examines two publications that discuss these issues from various angles and use distinct examples. "The Partial Success of Return Incentives for Guest Workers (December 14, 1974)" is the first article and details the number of Turkish employees who took financial inducements to return home amid the economic downturn that followed the first oil crisis. The second article is an academic analysis of youth subculture and political engagement in Greece between 1974 and 2010, written by Elia D. Kitis, a researcher of social movements and radicalism. Kitis looked at the chóros, a self-organized, autonomous, and anti-authoritarian place. This study compares and contrasts the two publications, focusing on the parallels and differences in their respective settings, sources, arguments, and consequences.
The first article is a primary source document from the German History in Documents and Images website titled "The Partial Success of Return Incentives for Guest Workers (December 14, 1974)". This newspaper article details the number of Turkish employees who took financial inducements to return home amid the economic downturn that followed the first oil crisis. Fear of deportation, a lack of social security, and familial connections are only some of the factors cited in the report contributing to the employees' choice. Some of the difficulties and ambiguities that Turkish workers experienced are highlighted, including unemployment, inflation, and political instability. This article offers a look into the transnational identity and economic condition of guest workers in 1970s Germany.
The second article by Elia D. Kitis, a historian of social movements and radicalism, analyzed the significance of the chóros in Greek youth subculture and political engagement from 1974 to 2010. In metropolitan regions, mainly Athens, young people congregated in chóros, a "self-organized, autonomous, and anti-authoritarian space," to mingle, express themselves, and take collective action. The chóros was a "laboratory of resistance" and "school of democracy" that created community, solidarity, and identity among its members, who frequently questioned the "authoritarian state" and "capitalist system" they saw as repressive and unfair. Some chóros members joined anarchist, autonomist, and anti-fascist organizations, which radicalized them.
Both articles examine European social movements towards the end of the 20th century in the context of the contine...