Week 4 Article Critique Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay

Review one of the articles in the listed in general readings for this week or find one of your choice that deals with this week’s topics. Write a 3-4 page paper (page count does not include title page or reference list) on the article and include a summary, how it relates to moral distress, philosophy or ethics. Include something that you can identify with from the article that you use in daily practice or something that you learned and will use in the future. Be sure to include a reference for this article as well as any others that you would refer to. This should be double spaced, 12 pt. font and in APA format. Be sure to use the attached rubric to address all the required content and expectations. *Because this assignment asks for your perspective you may use first person "I" when writing. Submit your paper here on or before Sunday week 4 by 11:59 pm.

Attachments



Article Critique Guidelines.docx



Rubric

Article Critique

Article Critique

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Premise and Supporting Points (Argument)



20.0 to >19.0 pts

HIGHLY COMPETENT Includes accurate identification of article premise, significant points in support of the premise, and the significance of these to the course and/or field Paper includes how the article content addresses moral distress, ethics, or philosophy



19.0 to >17.0 pts

COMPETENT 10-14 points Includes accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field, but one or more of them need improvement. Paper includes how the article content addresses moral distress, ethics, or philosophy



17.0 to >15.0 pts

SATISFACTORY One of the following is missing or insufficiently analytical: accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field



15.0 to >0 pts

UNSATISFACTORY More than one of the following are missing or insufficiently analytical: accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field; those included need improvement



20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Analysis



20.0 to >19.0 pts

Includes several analyses that relate the article to course content and real-life situations and future use.



19.0 to >17.0 pts

Includes some analyses that relate the article to course content and real-life situations



17.0 to >15.0 pts

Includes few analytical statements that relate the article to course content and real-life situations



15.0 to >0 pts

Includes general opinionated statements that are unrelated to the course content and real-life and/or are substantiated.



20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Evaluation of premise and supporting points (argument)



30.0 to >28.0 pts

Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s informed and substantiated opinion, thorough evaluation of the article’s premise, and supporting points



28.0 to >25.0 pts

Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s opinion and some evaluation of the article’s premise and/or arguments but overlooks some points



25.0 to >23.0 pts

Student’s opinion of the article is stated, along with critical evaluation of the article’s premise and/or argument, but some significant points are overlooked



23.0 to >0 pts

Student’s opinion of the article is not clear; critical thinking is not evident



30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Formatting



10.0 pts

Documents sources using APA formatting accurately and consistently



9.1 pts

Documents sources using APA formatting with minor violations



8.2 pts

Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA formatting.



7.3 pts

Uses little to no correct APA formatting



10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Mechanics



10.0 to >9.2 pts

Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors.



9.2 to >8.3 pts

Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling



8.3 to >7.4 pts

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness. Minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors. Several minor errors in punctuation and spelling.



7.4 to >0 pts

Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. Serious problems with sentence structure and grammar. Numerous major and/or minor errors in punctuation and spelling.



10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization



10.0 to >9.2 pts

The organization results in clarity and presents logically arranged points. Includes intro and conclusion



9.2 to >8.3 pts

The overall arrangement is logical but can occasionally be difficult to follow includes intro and conclusion



8.3 to >7.4 pts

Arrangement is less than clear, or organization is clear but there are some digressions



7.4 to >0 pts

Arrangement is haphazard and difficult to follow; paper strays substantially from topic



10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

please send me the article link, it has to be 5 years old