Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Why This Experiment was Unethical
Instructions
The Willowbrook Study (Darr, 2011, pp. 114-116) is not the only research study that raised concerns about the ethical treatment of study participants. In fact, there were others many others including the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Please select only ONE of the three options below to discuss in your assignment. Please be sure to complete your work to the minimum expectation of 2 full pages of text and a minimum of 3 reputable references, both in APA format.
Option #1
Summarize the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (in one paragraph). Then, discuss why this experiment was unethical. Discuss the numerous ethical issues that were raised resulting from this study.
Here are a few links that you may want to refer to:
Syphillis Study
Timeline
Option #2
If you would like to examine another study instead, feel free to do so. You must reference the article or website you used. Summarize the study in one paragraph. Then, discuss why this experiment was unethical. Discuss the numerous ethical issues that were raised resulting from the study.
Option #3
Discuss one of the following studies with ethical concerns:
Milgram Study, 1961
Stanford Prison Study, 1970
Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital (cancer), 1963
Summarize the study in one paragraph. Then, discuss why this experiment was unethical. Discuss the numerous ethical issues that were raised resulting from the study.
Unethical Treatment Of Research Study Participant
Name
Institution Affiliation
Course
Professor
Date
Unethical Treatment of Research Study Participant
Option One: Tuskegee Syphilis Study
The Tuskegee Syphilis study is considered to be the most unethical research to ever be conducted. The research was done between 1932 to 1972 in the United States of America. The Tuskegee research initially involved 600 Black men – 399 with syphilis, 201 who did not have the disease. Notably, the purpose of the research was to observe the natural progression of syphilis in black men by withholding treatment and misleading participants into thinking they were receiving medical care. Also, it failed to acquire informed consent from participants which is unethical. According to Alsan and Wanamaker (2017), Tuskegee Study became a symbol of their mistreatment by the medical establishment, a metaphor for deceit, conspiracy, malpractice, and neglect, if not outright genocide.
First, according to CDC, the Tuskegee researchers did not collect participants' consent which is crucial for ethics in research. Collecting consent ensures that participants are well informed about the research topic and they can make a choice if they want to participate in the study or not. However, the Tuskegee study did not acquire consent from the participants but rather told the participants that they were being treated for bad blood a name that referred to ailments such as anemia, fatigue, and syphilis by the locals (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2022).
Second, the participants were not informed of the study and the potential dangers of the study. The Tuskegee took a...