Regulation and Sustainability SWOT. Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay
Sources of external regulation in health care include licensing and credentialing of healthcare professionals as well as the current trend toward also requiring licensing and credentialing of non-contact health care staff (e.g., administrators, office personnel) to promote accountability congruent with medical and ethical practice. Further, the regulation from accrediting agencies brings credibility to the offerings of a health care organization, and they influence the flow of resources that create revenue for the organization. In addition, public policy can influence the regulation of health care, including federal regulation, which directly influences quality of care. It is, then, important to understand how to balance the need to remain legally compliant with the realities of sustainability in the healthcare industry. In this assignment, you will revise your submission regarding internal regulation in health care, perform a SWOT analysis of external regulatory influences in health care, and suggest how health care leaders should manage both internal and external regulation to promote quality of care and organizational sustainability.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the Topic 2 assignment, “Internal Regulation and Sustainability.”
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
Refer to Chapters 2-4 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. These chapters contain essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Directions:
Part 1
Present a revised version (1,500-1,800 words total) of the paper “Internal Regulation and Sustainability” that makes improvements in the caliber of the writing and incorporates instructor feedback regarding content and writing. Include the following in your submission:
A reflection (250-300 words) that provides a bulleted list of the changes you made to the paper and discusses your revision process including how you incorporated your instructor's feedback into the revised version. Similar to an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the introduction to the paper.
The revised paper that incorporates instructor feedback; clarifies the thesis statement and solidifies supporting arguments; edits for grammar, spelling, and punctuation; adjusts word choice to display professional and scholarly language; and adjusts sentence structure for improved readability.
Part 2
Write an additional 1,500-1,750 words in which you perform a SWOT analysis of the external regulatory influences in health care that have been discussed in this course and suggest how health care leaders should manage both internal and external regulation to promote quality of care and organizational sustainability. This section should flow naturally from the revised paper. You may also need to revise your introduction and thesis statement to allow the papers to connect. Include the following in your paper:
A research-supported discussion of the strengths of the external regulations discussed in this course. How do these regulatory influences promote patient care and organizational sustainability?
A research-supported discussion of the weaknesses of the external regulations discussed in this course. How might these regulatory influences inhibit patient care and organizational sustainability?
A research-supported discussion of the opportunities created by compliance with the external regulations discussed in this course. How might compliance with these regulatory influences create opportunities for improving patient care and enhancing organizational sustainability?
A research-supported discussion of the threats created by the external regulations discussed in this course. How do these regulatory influences threaten quality patient care and organizational sustainability?
A research-supported discussion of how health care leaders should manage the internal and external regulation to promote quality of care and organizational sustainability.
SWOT Analysis of External Regulations
Name
Institution
Due Date
SWOT Analysis of External Regulations
The healthcare sector of any country is one of the most crucial aspects. Maintaining optimal health of a nation functions as the backbone of any economy in the world. However, like any other facet of a country, there is a need for regulations that help to enforce certain requirements within the healthcare sector. In the U.S., there are several state and federal regulatory agencies whose roles may be clearly defined but can overlap at times. The overwhelming role of these agencies is to help enhance the healthcare of the public. Their relevance is made evident in how they help ensure compliance while also ensuring that everyone has access to the services offered in the public healthcare system. In this paper, four external regulatory agencies will be assessed and their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats clearly outlined. Additionally, this paper seeks to determine the ways in which healthcare leaders should manage internal and external regulation to help promote quality of care and organizational sustainability.
SWOT AHRQ
AHRQ is short for the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. It is a federal agency that like the rest seeks to improve the quality of healthcare albeit through the collection of data and provision of evidence-based practice guidelines for healthcare practitioners. The relevance of AHRQ has indeed been felt in the U.S. since its inception in 1989. However, there have been some issues as well which offer an opportunity for growth for the agency. Below is an in-depth analysis of the agency.
Strengths
One major strength of AHRQ is its good relationship with healthcare providers. Without great partnerships, all of AHRQ’s projects would never return any data that could be deemed usable. Kronick (2016, p. 230) writes that it is because of AHRQ’s great relationship with the healthcare provider community that ensures its tools and resources eventually find their way into the settings of care.
Another AHRQ’s strength is its reputation as a crucial asset to the nation as a credible provider of information to policymakers, patients, and providers (Kronick, 2016, p. 230). It is through its reputation as a national treasure that AHRQ was able to sponsor the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) which is a family database (AHRQ). The HCUP database is made of other small databases including the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID), the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), etc.
Weaknesses
The first weakness of AHRQ is its inability to provide accurate and timely data. In a post from Khanna, this weakness is listed as a major challenge because the agency is unable to provide a holistic view of the nation’s healthcare system (2019, para. 8).
Aside from the above, there is the issue of medical errors that continue to curtail the enhancement of healthcare in the U.S. Currently, the predictive analytics employed by AHRQ are limited and cannot be served effectively to reduce these errors (AHRQ, 2019, para. 10).
Opportunities
Enhance research and investment in predictive analysis to help reduce the impact of medical errors in the U.S. Allen and Pierce (2016, para. 1) write that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. Approximately 250,000 people die every year because of medical errors. Preventive measures are indeed crucial here because some of these errors are preventable and result as a result of negligence.
Threats
The major threat for AHRQ is technologically based. Any organization or agency that deals with vast amounts of data are subject to the threat of hacking. So, it is crucial that AHRQ maintains high security of its databases to help prevent hackers from stealing, tampering, or manipulating patient data.
SWOT CMS
CMS or what is otherwise known as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the agency charged with ensuring every American is able to access healthcare regardless of their age, condition, or income. While Medicare is a federal program that caters to individuals who are 65 years and above as well as some disabled people, Medicaid is a program that caters mainly to low-income individuals and families.
Strengths
With Medicare, as of 2016, 57 million Americans received Medicare benefits. The Alliance for Retired Americans estimates the specific numbers to be 47.9 million individuals who are 65 years and above and 9.1 million disabled individuals. On the other hand, Medicaid also continues to report increased enrollment with 64.5 million people reported to have enrolled as of 2019 (Medicaid, 2019, para. 2). The strength of this program lies in its ability to reach many people which showcases faith in the system without which there can never be sustainability in healthcare.
Weaknesses
However, like any agency, CMS has its weaknesses. For Medicare, one major issue is the presence of gaps in its coverage. Often, patients are left to grapple with some costs that could include copayments and deductibles. This, therefore, necessitates private covers such as Medigap that continue to exploit patients.
For Medicaid, the main issue lies in its coverage limitation. As explained by Touschner (2013, para 2), there are instances when Medicaid is not considered MEC or Minimum Essential Coverage and this particular point can determine the availability of premium tax credits.
Opportunities
One opportunity for CMS is to improve coverage of the disabled population. Lagu et al. note that the lack of mechanisms to ensure that care is being provided to the disabled is the underlying challenge to their access to care (2015, p. 2). CMS needs to be empowered so that it can reach beyond its current mandate and maneuver beyond the bureaucracy that often derails government agencies.
Threats
New diseases, for example, the Coronavirus. New diseases will always threaten the promotion of patient care in the country as well as organizational sustainability. This is mainly because of the erosion of the belief in the ability of the healthcare sector to protect the citizens. CMS might have done a great job of increasing the number of Americans with health insurance covers. However, the advent of a new disease and one as deadly as Coronavirus renders these covers null and void if a cure is not discovered.
SWOT CDC
Strengths
One of the key strengths of the CDC or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lies in its ability to surveil diseases and evaluate the health of a nation through its laboratories and medical research. This is indeed a major factor as far as the promotion of patient care is concerned.
Another major strength of the CDC is the many partnerships that the agency has. The CDD has partnerships with other institutions that are in the private sector, the World Health Organization, the Un...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Disabilities Health, Medicine, Nursing Assignment.
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
-
Article Summary-Dementia with older adults
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
-
Lesson Plan refinement. Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |