Nursing Regulatory Challenges, Qualitative Methodologies are Essential

Nursing Regulatory Challenges, Qualitative Methodologies are Essential
For studies on nursing regulatory challenges, qualitative methodologies are essential. They ensure that their perspectives and experiences are taken into account when assessing the effects of enacting policy and informing regulation. Quantitative approaches, on the other hand, rely on statistics and precision. For nursing research, both techniques are necessary. However, they both have advantages and disadvantages (Squires, 2018).
The researcher employs a strict and controlled design to investigate a phenomenon through accurate measurements when using the quantitative technique. A quantitative study might, for example, look at a patient's heart rate after consuming a caffeinated beverage. On the other hand, the qualitative method examines things in-depth and holistically.
The advantage of using the qualitative approach is that it focuses on more profound insights into the design. The method elicits deeper insights into the results' design, administration, and interpretation (Rutberg, 2018). For example, when dealing with patients having a chronic illness, the nurse has to interview the patient to know what it means to be chronically ill. The method has made it possible and has made it known to people who did not know about it. In addition, the technique helps to determine the behavior and perception of the afflicted parties. For example, the researcher can understand if the person being interviewed feels stigmatized and the consequences of stigmatization. The results can help prescribe solutions to...