Managing Quality Assurance In The Workplace Health, Medicine Essay

Managing Quality Assurance
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Course:
Instructor:
Date:
Managing Quality Assurance
According to Gadolin and Andersson (2017), quality assurance is the practice of maintaining high quality in healthcare through practical measures. It is the process of identifying and monitoring the aspects of patient care to attain healthcare quality using the available resources. Most healthcare organizations depend on quality assurance for purposes of improving patient outcomes. Quality Assurance (Q.A.) teams develop strategies and integrate programs that would help achieve this. Q.A. initiatives include monitoring healthcare professionals in charge of patients, tracking the progress of patients, and promoting wellness programs that would prevent illness (Gadolin & Andersson, 2017). Q.A. experts have proficiency in the laws and regulations and managing medical. This paper intends to give an in-depth analysis of how the United States could manage quality assurance in the healthcare workplace to provide outstanding care-based services.
Cookson et al. (2018) posit that health equity and quality of care are crucial agendas on matters of healthcare. Health organizations across the world are making endless efforts to integrate these two for better performance in health care workplaces. Improving quality entails ensuring patient safety and having cost-effective care. Cookson et al. (2018) add that enhancing equity in terms of performance of care providers could also lead to better outcomes and worker satisfaction. The United States government should make sure healthcare organizations are aware of the significance of health equity in achieving health quality. The United States government should endeavor to protect the interests of the country through high-quality health care. The government needs to preserve each one of these interests by promoting fairness and efficiency in healthcare.
Hospital staff ought to have a vast knowledge of the patient reports aside from the performance indicators. Frequent monitoring of programs helps employees understand the need for quality and makes them more committed to the quality assurance program. Health organizations should identify the challenges facing patient safety and make necessary adjustments. Sometimes staff training is one way of making staff aware of the barriers of patient care and methods of curbing this problem. Another corrective strategy might include changing the policies that bar staff from providing competent care. Mosadeghrad and Woldemichael (2017) posit that health organizations should have an idea of the root causes of clinical errors and procedures for limiting their occurrence. It is worth noting that aside from improving clinical outcomes, quality assurance programs bring health professionals together.
DeGenova (2020) suggests that the U.S. government should strive to fill up the gaps that exist in healthcare that stand in the way of patient safety. If possible, the government could form partnerships with the federal, local governments, or private entities to make this possible. Quality assurance could sometime be impossible to achieve without combining the efforts of the public and private sectors (DeGenova, 2020). For instance, the federal government could serve a great deal as a research sponsor for the improvement of care. The U.S. government needs to regulate the entire process of patient care in the country's healthcare system (DeGenova, 2020). The united states should make sure that its federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and IHS, are doing all they could to improve patient safety and quality care.
The United States should ensure consistency between clinical knowledge and care process (DeGenova, 2020). The measurements should allow for checks and balances and a limitation of medical errors. The performance measurement needs to be consistent throughout the government programs. DeGenova (2020) posits that standardized performance measures would limit inconsistency across healthcare organizations. When healthcare programs are regulated, it reduces the administrative burden. The government also needs a clear conceptual framework that gives care providers a chance to maximize their performance.
The U.S. government should ensure transparency while in partnership with various stakeholders. Transparency is essential when addressing safety measures and factors that disadvantage quality care. Congress, for instance, should encourage the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Veterans Affairs to collaborate in forming a standard performance measure for health professionals across the country (DeGenova, 2020). Congress needs to fairly and equally distribute the public reporting requirements in all healthcare sectors. Following the rapid changes in medical science and technology, the United States should work on reducing the causes of chronic illnesses. The government's responsibility in treating chronic diseases should reflect on its programs for healthcare. Since most users of Medicare and VHA programs suffer from chronic diseas...