Evaluation tool. Health, Medicine, Nursing Assignment
You have completed training on COVID-19, with the Learning Needs Assessment Population you identified in Week 3, create an evaluation for teaching.
Rubric
Week Five Evaluation Tool Development Assignment Rubric
Week Five Evaluation Tool Development Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConducts a Review of Literature
10.0 to >8.0 pts
PROFICIENT Performs a thorough literature search. At least 3-5 references provided. Review presented in document is of excellent quality.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
COMPETENT a basic literature search. 1-2 references provided. Review presented in document is of satisfactory quality.
4.0 to >0 pts
NOVICE Performs a less than acceptable literature search. 0-1 references provided. No review presented in document or less than satisfactory review presented.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhilosophical/Theoretical Framework presented
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Excellent understanding of Philosophical/Theoretical Framework to best evaluate the learning situation/process. The framework presented is of excellent value.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Displays a moderate to high level understanding of the type of Philosophical/Theoretical Framework required for learning evaluation tool. Tool presented is appropriate.
4.0 to >0 pts
No Philosophical/Theoretical Framework presented in document. Unsatisfactory presentation of Framework presented.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Techniques/skills/Grammar/Spelling
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Very good to excellent writing skills presented in document submitted.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Moderate to satisfactory writing skills displayed in submitted document. Few to occasional errors in writing noted.
4.0 to >0 pts
Poor writing skills are evident in the document provided. Poor use of grammar and punctuation, and spelling.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBehavioral Objectives Presented
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Very good to Excellent coverage of behavioral objectives identified in Evaluation tool.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Less than adequate or bare minimum of behavioral objectives identified in Evaluation tool.
4.0 to >0 pts
No behavioral objectives identified in Evaluation tool. Minimal mention or presentation of behavioral objectives - poorly worded or explained.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeasurement Framework Presented
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Norm and criterion mentioned. Thorough understanding of measurement framework concept is evidenced.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Mentions norm or criterion measurement framework. Shows a basic to moderate level of understanding of measurement framework concept.
4.0 to >0 pts
No mention of norm or criterion measurement framework. Minimal to no understanding of the measurement framework concept.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeElements
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Very good to excellent presentation of critical versus desired elements as required.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Presents critical elements or desired elements but does not present both aspects. Satisfactorily presents the elements required.
4.0 to >0 pts
Does not identify or minimally mentions elements required needed for evaluation tool.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScoring system
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Does a very good to excellent presentation of the necessary scoring system. Cut score for P/F or letter grades addressed.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Does a satisfactorily presentation of the necessary scoring system. Does not cover scoring system thoroughly.
4.0 to >0 pts
No scoring system presented in evaluation tool or unsatisfactory coverage of scoring system.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Formative/Summative Assessment
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Very good to excellent coverage of formative and/or summative assessment tools as appropriate for tool.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Satisfactorily presents information concerning formative or summative assessment tools. Moderate to satisfactory coverage of topic.
4.0 to >0 pts
No mention or minimal coverage of formative or summative assessment concepts.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDirections for tool usage
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Very good or excellent set of instructions provided for the user.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Provides basic instructions for the user of the evaluation tool. Instructions may not be thorough enough.
4.0 to >0 pts
Does not provide instructions for the user of the evaluation tool or provides incomplete instructions for user.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReliability/Validity of tool
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Very good or excellent presentation and understanding of reliability and/or validity of evaluation tool. Thorough understanding of these concepts displayed.
8.0 to >4.0 pts
Satisfactory plan presented for reliability or validity of tool but not both. Displays a basic understanding of these concepts.
4.0 to >0 pts
No plan or basic plan offered for reliability and validity of tool. No literature support presented.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Evaluation Tool
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Evaluation Tool
Evaluation is an important procedure in a teaching and learning exercise. According to Tripathi and Kumar (2018), it helps teachers and learners to improve their teaching and learning respectively. Evaluations, also called assessments, are based on four learning theories that include behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism (Guey, Cheng, & Shibata, 2010). This evaluation will mainly focus on the behavioral response of the learners to the procedure.
The evaluation, in this case, will be in the form of summative assessments. This assessment differs from the formative assessment as former occurs after a period of learning, whereas the latter is a continuous process (Ghaicha, 2016). The learning outcome will be assessed based on a grading rubric. The rubric will be as shown below.
Evaluation Rubric
Behavioral Objectives
Measurement Framework
Critical vs. Desired Elements
Scoring System
1 - 3
Understanding the origin, mode of transmission and current research in the management of COVID-19 pandemic.
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Healthcare Administration: Stakeholders Comparison
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
-
Governance of healthcare systems
3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
-
Measurement Scales. Health, Medicine, Nursing Essay
2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |