Critical Evaluation of Leadership within an Organisation Essay

Critical Evaluation of Leadership Within an Organization
[name]
[school/course]
[Professor]Practice Setting of Physicians in Australia
In the medical field, professionals acquire multiple studies, training, and work experiences for many reasons. It can be rank or position, salary grade, or title. Part of refining their professional capabilities is practicing it in an actual field. It means that medical professionals are deployed in a practice setting where they carry out their respective duties. Practice setting is the workspace where medical professionals of all ranks and titles practice their medical commitment. The setting may be solo, group, or in partnership with freelance medical professionals (Masters, 2019).
The practice setting from the Belbin profile is a collaboration of medical professionals in attending to patients from communities. According to Masters (2019), this type of practice can be single-specialty practice or multispecialty practice. These two practice settings differ in the kind of medical service they offer; they are defined as their names suggest. The single-specialty practice setting has medical professionals that are experts and specializes in a particular care service. For instance, there are health institutions that specialize in cardiology, pediatrics, pulmonology, etc. On the other hand, the practitioners in a multispecialty practice setting are from different expertise. This practice setting offers health care from different branches of medicine. One multispecialty practice setting can consist of almost all the medical specializations, and from consultants to surgeons (Acponline, 2018; Masters, 2019).
This practice set is economically advantaged because of its capacity to accommodate patients. Larger capacity means a higher chance of financial stability of a health institution. It can hire enough medical professionals to tend to a large number of admitted patients; they provide the institution enough fund for equipment pieces, and development of both the institution and its health workers. For practitioners, this setting gives them a wider connection to other medical practitioners and specialists. For instance, a surgeon works with several nurses, radiologists, anesthesiologists, etc. It allows them to collaborate with them and experience their work ethics. Another advantage is that having enough attending physicians and other health providers give a healthier working space for them. Their duty hours can give them enough rest time (Acponline, 2018; Masters, 2019).
However, having many heads in a team is having many minds working. This is the disadvantage of this practice setting; there may occur a difference in opinion and decisions. Although the primary concern of medical professionals is the patients well being, they may argue on what to prioritize in the patient's being -- the physical injury or psychological stability? There may also be a conflict in deciding what medical branch or specialization to give more attention, especially in a multispecialty practice setting. All health issues and concerns need proper attention but medication cannot always be done all at once. There may be instances when physicians will argue how to deal with the patient's health issues without compromising any part (Types of Medical Practices: Advantages & Disadvantages, 2018)
Medical practitioners consider their practice setting carefully because it will influence their experience and performance. Practice setting may determine how well they work under a given circumstance. Their productivity as a medical practitioner must also be measured when in a practice setting. It will give them an idea if they have improved and truly maximized their professional capabilities as a medical worker.
Practice Development and Personal Development:
WHO Framework on Strengthening of Leadership and Management
Even over the last five years, medical advances on different medical branches continue to flourish and drive the health sector forward (Chorzewski, M., et al. 2017; Mikstacki, A., et al. 2014; Zarebska-Michaluk, D., et al., 2019) Choezewski, et al (2017). They studied the protective factors found in the saliva of patients with type 2 diabetes. A study in the field of pharmacogenetics was conducted in the development of anesthetics response (Mikstacki, A., et al. 2014). On the other hand, a treatment study on HCV genotype was conducted to compare the reactions of antiviral drugs (Zarebska-Michaluk, D., et al., 2019).
Aside from medical scientific and technological advances, the personal professional development of medical practitioners is also being developed. The Leadership system in the medical field needs planning that puts into consideration both the patients, institution and health care providers. This system is anchored on pieces of medical evidence that is proven and being used for decades. It plans out the medical care that fits the patient with the most updated technology but also with consideration to their financial capacity (Timmins, 2015).
World Health Organization has established a framework that addresses leadership and management in the health care practice setting. The framework presentation from WHO lays out the challenges, interventions, case examples, suggestions, and solutions in medical leadership and management. World Health Organization identifies that the challenges in management and leadership are that lack of experienced and competent professionals, issues on resources and accountability, and vague responsibility assignment. These challenges are being addressed in many attempts to improve the system. However, even the solutions are lacking like training goals which only favors several professionals individually instead of team improvement. In an attempt to contribute to the advancement in this system of medicinal practice, WHO designed a framework that targets the improvement in managing resources, health service, and worker relationships (World Health Organization, 2020).
The first solution from the framework is having enough managers. Managers in a medical setting are responsible for their team's maneuver on a conflict (Northhouse, P. 2007; Schein, 2004). For this number of managers to be effective in the field, according to the second solution from the framework of WHO, competencies in leadership and management must be developed. Timmins' (2015) study suggests that emotional intelligence counts as competency in management. According to the study, managers must humble themselves to avoid credit grabbing. They must understand that, even if it is the managers who lead the team's action, everyone does their duties accordingly. Their emotional intelligence will allow them to think considerably of the team's effort and not his/her contribution (Timmins, 2015). In addition to the competencies that a manager must have, communication skills play a significant role as well. Managers ...