Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.58
Topic:
Assignment: Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement Essay
Essay Instructions:
Assignment: Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
As a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.
Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.
To Prepare:
Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)
Part 1: Legislation Grid
Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:
Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:
Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal and State Legislation Part 1: Legislation Grid Based on the health-related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following: • Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed. • Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill. • Identify the target populations addressed by the bill. • Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees? |
Points Range: 32 (32%) - 35 (35%)
The response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health-related bill.
The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health-related bill. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 28 (28%) - 31 (31%)
The response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.
The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 25 (25%) - 27 (27%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill.
The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 24 (24%)
Summary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing. Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. The description of the current status of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. Feedback:
|
| Advocating for Legislation Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following: • Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position. • Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples. |
Points Range: 45 (45%) - 50 (50%)
Testimony clearly and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill.
Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples. A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the responses provided. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 40 (40%) - 44 (44%)
Testimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill.
Response provides an accurate explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example. An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the responses provided. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%)
Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate. A vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 34 (34%)
Testimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing.
Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources is provided, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. The recommendation of an amendment to the bill in support of the position is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Feedback:
|
| Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback:
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Feedback:
|
| Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Feedback:
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Feedback:
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Feedback:
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:
|
| Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Feedback:
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Feedback:
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Feedback:
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Essay Sample Content Preview:
3273425101600Legislation Grid Template020000Legislation Grid Template
Legislation Grid Template
Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Health-related Bill Name
Community Health Center Mental Health Screening Act
Bill Number
H.R.8351
Description
This bill authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services to award grants for mental and behavioral health screenings and mental health services to federally qualified health centers.
Federal or State?
Federal
Legislative Intent
To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to Federally qualified health centers to conduct mental and behavioral health screenings and for other purposes.
Proponents/ Opponents
Proponents:
Rep. Blunt Rochester, Lisa [D-DE-At Large]
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]
Rep. San Nicolas, Michael F. Q. [D-GU-At Large]
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8]
Rep. Cardenas, Tony [D-CA-29]
Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]
Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]
Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30]
Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]
Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3]
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11]
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]
Opponents:
None yet.
Target Population
General Public
Status of the bill (Is it in hearings or committees?)
Introduced in the House. It is under review by the House committee awaiting to be sent on to the House or Senate as a whole
General Notes/Comments
This Bill will amend Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 254b) and add a new subsection covering mental and behavioral screening grants.
Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Mental illnesses are ...
Legislation Grid Template
Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment Legislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Health-related Bill Name
Community Health Center Mental Health Screening Act
Bill Number
H.R.8351
Description
This bill authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services to award grants for mental and behavioral health screenings and mental health services to federally qualified health centers.
Federal or State?
Federal
Legislative Intent
To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to Federally qualified health centers to conduct mental and behavioral health screenings and for other purposes.
Proponents/ Opponents
Proponents:
Rep. Blunt Rochester, Lisa [D-DE-At Large]
Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]
Rep. San Nicolas, Michael F. Q. [D-GU-At Large]
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Rep. Sires, Albio [D-NJ-8]
Rep. Cardenas, Tony [D-CA-29]
Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]
Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]
Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30]
Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]
Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3]
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11]
Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-27]
Opponents:
None yet.
Target Population
General Public
Status of the bill (Is it in hearings or committees?)
Introduced in the House. It is under review by the House committee awaiting to be sent on to the House or Senate as a whole
General Notes/Comments
This Bill will amend Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 254b) and add a new subsection covering mental and behavioral screening grants.
Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Mental illnesses are ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: