Assignment 4.1: Building a Matrix, Part 2

Directions Locate two primary research articles that inform your DNP project. Using Matrix (Word)Links to an external site., describe the research articles you found. Like last week, this matrix is like a comprehensive notecard that contains the basic information about the research. You are creating a shortcut version of the key elements of the article for your future use in synthesizing the literature. My DNP project is about medication safety for patients 50 years and older. APA format is required for the references, but not for the document. What to Submit Two completed matrices in Microsoft Word The full-text articles in Adobe PDF If you copy and paste references from the course into your assignment, be sure to confirm APA formatting before submitting. Similarity Score After submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score. Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file. It may take up to 24 hours for your similarity score to appear. Building a Matrix Part 2 (Primary Research) Rubric Building a Matrix Part 2 (Primary Research) Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Variable and Key Concepts 2 pts Excellently written, showing deep understanding of the variables and key concepts. 1.82 pts Well-written, showing a strong understanding of the variables and key concepts. 1.68 pts Somewhat well-written, showing a basic understanding of the variables and key concepts. 1.58 pts Poorly written, showing little understanding of the variables and key concepts. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written, showing no effort in understanding the variables and key concepts. / 2 pts Sampling 2 pts Excellently written, showing deep understanding of the sampling. 1.82 pts Well-written, showing a strong understanding of the sampling. 1.68 pts Somewhat well-written, showing a basic understanding of the sampling. 1.58 pts Poorly written, showing little understanding of the sampling. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written, showing no effort in understanding the sampling. / 2 pts Design and Method 2 pts Excellently written, showing deep understanding of the design and methods. 1.82 pts Well-written, showing a strong understanding of the design and methods. 1.68 pts Somewhat well-written, showing a basic understanding of the design and methods. 1.58 pts Poorly written, showing little understanding of the design and methods. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written, showing no effort in understanding the design and methods. / 2 pts Instruments and Data Collection 2 pts Excellently written, showing deep understanding of the instruments and data collection. 1.82 pts Well-written, showing a strong understanding of the instruments and data collection. 1.68 pts Somewhat well-written, showing a basic understanding of the instruments and data collection. 1.58 pts Poorly written, showing little understanding of the instruments and data collection. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written, showing no effort in understanding the instruments and data collection. / 2 pts Results 2 pts Excellently written, showing deep understanding of the results. 1.82 pts Well-written, showing a strong understanding of the results. 1.68 pts Somewhat well-written, showing a basic understanding of the results. 1.58 pts Poorly written, showing little understanding of the results. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written, showing no effort in understanding the results. / 2 pts Strengths and Limitations 2 pts Excellently written, showing deep understanding of the strengths and limitations. 1.82 pts Well-written, showing a strong understanding of the strengths and limitations. 1.68 pts Somewhat well-written, showing a basic understanding of the strengths and limitations. 1.58 pts Poorly written, showing little understanding of the strengths and limitations. 0 pts Missing or very poorly written, showing no effort in understanding the strengths and limitations. / 2 pts Critique 4 pts Excellently written critique, showing deep understanding of the article(s). 3.75 pts Somewhat well-written critique, showing a basic understanding of the article(s). 3.25 pts Well-written critique, showing a strong understanding of the article(s). 3 pts Poorly written critique, showing little understanding of the article(s). 0 pts Missing or very poorly written critique, showing no effort understanding of the article(s). / 4 pts APA Format 4 pts No errors in format. 3.75 pts A few minor errors in format. 3.25 pts Many minor errors in format. 3 pts Major errors in format. 0 pts APA format is not used. / 4 pts Total Points: 0