Argument against COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Healthcare Workers
This paper is for an Argumentation and Advocacy class
The Topic I chose is an Argument against COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Healthcare Workers
• Summarize the position/argument researched and assess it for validity. Ensure you are directly quoting the source and summarizing it in syllogistic form. The expectation is for you to show the syllogism and assess it for validity using the tools covered in this course.
• Identify the assumptions of the position by drawing inferences from its communicated proposition. Specifically, explicitly draw out any connections or contradictions to the Christian Worldview presented by the argument. These inferences should setup your argument.
• Construct a valid argument that contradicts, challenges, or improves the position of the organization. Again, show the syllogism and its validity.
At least five academic peer-reviewed sources are required for this paper.
A Critique of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Healthcare Workers
Student Name
University
Course
Professor Name
Date
A Critique of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Healthcare Workers
Navigating Individual Autonomy and Ethical Considerations
The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a heated debate over implementing compulsory vaccination for healthcare professionals. This article examines the opposition to COVID-19 vaccination requirements for healthcare workers, analyzing its logical structure and soundness. Furthermore, fundamental assumptions of this stance are made, and judgments about its congruity with the Christian worldview. The subsequent discussion in this paper will present an opposing argument on what makes it ethical to enforce vaccination mandates and the role of society in this matter.
Argument Analysis
Opposition to mandatory vaccinations for healthcare professionals stems from preserving personal freedom and autonomy in healthcare decision-making. This autonomy is breached with the implementation of vaccination mandates, leading to ethical concerns (Kates et al., 2021). Upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that this argument's soundness relies heavily on accepting its fundamental assumption, which posits that individual liberty should always be prioritized above group health concerns. On the other hand, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global arena introduces a complicated ethical dimension that demands thorough examination. Do individual rights suggest that in a public health crisis all people have equal rights? Such a study is about societal obligations in light of the wellness of society as a whole.
Therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic's worldwide impact forms the basis of this argument from a psychological angle through the freedoms of man at all times. It is a significant point that raises questions about how privacy can be defined and what people must do in order to find solutions (Biswas et al., 2021). Concerning health care, it is