100% (1)
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
10
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 23.76
Topic:

Rhetoric Movements: The British Anti-Apartheid Movement

Essay Instructions:

Rhetoric of Social Movements – Final Paper



100 points



Due: April 18th on Canvas



You  may write this paper alone or with up to 4 other people from class (No more than 5 people per paper). You will choose a protest or social movement (The protest or movement you choose has to focus on something other than your home country). Your job is to thoroughly research the protest or social movement and apply protest strategies (how a social movement is born and protest rhetoric) to the formulation of the movement.



Your paper should address the following:





  • Overview of the social movement or protest (this should be in detail, assume that I will be unfamiliar with your social movement/ protest). Include:



    • Social, cultural, historical context/ factors which led to the movement


    • Timeline of events


    • Detail the leaders of the movement/ protest


    • Identify key groups and people at the forefront of the movement










  • Address, in detail, how the social movement was born; apply and break down these themes with examples. Include:






  • Clear evidence


  • Unrest


  • Establish powers fail


  • Strategy for change


  • Establishment is challenged


  • Public confrontation






  • Discuss the language (Refer to research on Muted Group Theory, etc) strategies of the movement. Include a breakdown of the following:






  •  Vilification


  • Objectification


  • Mythification


  • Legitimation




 

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Name:
Course:
Instructor:
Date:
The British Anti-Apartheid Movement.
The response of the outside world to the improvement of politically-sanctioned racial segregation was boundless, and by the 1980s represented a managed test toward the South African administration, which, confronting bunch inside and outer dangers, in the end, abdicated to clear a path for another, just agreement. Nations all over the world took different measures to debilitate and topple politically-sanctioned racial segregation. It was the counter politically-sanctioned racial discrimination developments in the United Kingdom, Holland and the United States of America that mounted the most genuine of these difficulties to the politically-sanctioned racial segregation Express, the UK's maybe being the best of every single such association all through the globe. The UK's Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) had opened an extensive variety of battles and built up branches all through the nation by the late 1980s. From small beginnings, the AAM built up a crusade that ended up noticeably a standout amongst the most active worldwide solidarity developments ever, a model that has along these lines been utilized to debilitate or dislodge numerous other authoritarian administrations (Ibrahim, J., 2015).
The AAM created joins with political gatherings and other intense powers to set up and strengthen compelling measures to destabilize each part of politically-sanctioned genetic segregation structure, mounting financial, social, exchange and games blacklists which brought about approvals crusades bolstered by governments all through the world. By its tendency, the AAM was a co-ordinating machine – incapable itself to accomplish its objectives, and it induced people, associations, political structures, and governments to take whatever activities would be essential to achieve the disengagement and debilitating of the politically-sanctioned racial segregation state. Its capacity was to make capable on-screen characters –, for example, governments, political gatherings, exchange unions and labor organizations or the United Nations, additionally masses of people acting in show – take critical choices that had material and, regularly, notable impacts. The accomplishment of the AAM was to one, gradually, more than three decades, convey the familiarity with the issues to the British. And secondly, to weigh the British and different governments to in the end throttle the politically-sanctioned racial segregation machine by halting exchange, cutting off oil supplies and access to arms, and confining white South Africans to the point that it was compelled to destroy its abusive administration (Dubow, S., 2014).
Muted Group Theory
This is a theory that tries explaining the reason as to why some groups of individuals within the societal setup, continue being powerless in comparison to the rest. It essentially analyzes the gender themes, to highlight how the masculine gender remains the dominant one over the feminine. The gender imbalance has been there since historical times, and as a result, the women have adapted to the situation and opted to keep quiet. This theory can therefore be used in the study and analysis of marginalized groups in society. In the case under this discussion, it can be utilized to analyze the situation in South Africa during the colonial times. The British colonialists had the Africans boxed in, to the extent that these Africans suffered in silence.
It was done in the following ways;
Vilification: This is whereby the whites acted in a way that incited hatred for the blacks. Vilification is an attack on the appearance of an individual. This, the whites did to great effect.
Objectification: This is the process by which one makes the other feel inferior and useless. The whites, during the apartheid, made blacks feel inferior and lower level to them. The segregation was aimed at making this belief to sink in, even more.
Mythification: This is whereby there is some unproven belief about something or someone. During the apartheid regime, the whites made the blacks believe that they were generally inferior in each and every way, without any proof whatsoever, of the same. It became a myth, that blacks were inferior.
Legitimation: This is the passing of laws that enforce something. In the apartheid regime, laws were passed, aimed at enforcing the racial segregation. Through legitimation, racial segregation became a lawful act.
By the late 1950s, Britain was one of South Africa's most critical exchanging accomplices, with more than 30 percent of South Africa's imports originating from the UK, and 28 percent of South Africa's fares going to Britain. Other than the financial relationship, Britain appreciated close relations with its former province, and in the vicinity of 1946 and 1959, 113,000 Britons had settled in South Africa. Notwithstanding, different parts of British culture in the long run conflicted with white control. Since the nineteenth century, London wound up plainly home to oust from all aspects of the world, prominently to Karl Marx, who composed his most well-known and persuasive to me, Das Kapital, in the British Library. Thus, South Africans escaping from politically-sanctioned racial segregation in the mid-1950s settled in the undeniably cosmopolitan capital of the British Empire and built structures that went up against their very own existence. Vella Pillay, and Tennyson Makiwane, among numerous others, all settled in England for periods and utilized it as a base from which to lead the battle against politically-sanctioned racial segregation. It was Vella Pillay and Tennyson Makiwane who initially settled the germ of the Anti-Apartheid Movement on British soil. They started holding gatherings in the 1950s and arranged the first blacklists of South African items, which inevitably finished in the exceedingly persuasive AAM (Stevens, S., 2016).
On 26 June 1959, the Committee of African Organizations (CAO) held a meeting at Holbourne Hall in London, requiring the British open to blacklist South African items, particularly natural product, which was accessible in towns and urban areas all through the UK. Julius Nyerere, then pioneer of the Tanganyikan African National Union and Kanyama Chiume of the Nyasaland African National Congress were the first speakers. The Congress Movement's - African National Congress (ANC) and Vella Pillay South African Indian Congress (SAIC) added their voices to the interest. In November 1959 a Boycott Committee was framed, and the CAO's Dennis Phombeah was made the director of the body. Different associations assumed a crucial part in the board of trustees, Christian Action, including the Movement for Colonial Freedom, and the Universities and New Left Review. Patrick van Rensburg of the South African Liberal Party additionally went up against a critical part, and he requested that Chief Albert Luthuli issue an announcement requiring a global blacklist, which Luthuli did in a publi...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Sign In
Not register? Register Now!