Article Critique. MGT 501 case assignment. Changes that Ms. Myers could have adopted

Essay Instructions:

Read the attachments, please review assignment instructions and read article by sarah green. Please review well written paper and formatted the paper according to the example

1 THE NATURE OF ORGANIZATIONS AND THE CONTEMPORARY ENVIRONMENT

2 Background

In this assignment we will look at how the environment affects institutions and how by managing this interaction successfully, we can increase organizational effectiveness.

3 Required Reading

Green, S. (2011). The would-be pioneer. Harvard Business Review. 89(4), 124-126. This article can be found in EBSCO.

4 Assignment

After reading the above fictional case of an American expatriate manager working in a South Korean firm and the background readings for this module, analyze the situation in a 4- to 5-page analysis that addresses the following:

How does culture and environment affect institutions and their management?

5 Keys to the Assignment

The key aspects of this assignment that should be covered in your paper include:

Define the problem: What went wrong during Ms. Myers tenure from your point of view?
Analyze the cause: Explain the problem Ms. Myers is encountering using Hofstede's five dimensions of culture to compare Korean and American assumptions about interpersonal relationships and management.
Propose a solution: Make a recommendation of three specific changes Ms. Myers could have made to her management style to accommodate the Korean environment.

6 Assignment Expectations

Your paper will be evaluated on the following seven (7) points:

Precision - Does the paper address the question(s) or task(s)?
Breadth - Is the full breadth of the subject, i.e., the Keys to the Assignment, addressed?
Depth - Does the paper address the topic in sufficient depth and include the background readings and other background resources as references?
Critical thinking - Is the subject thought about critically, i.e., accurately, logically, relevantly, and precisely?
Clarity - Is the writing clear and are the concepts articulated properly? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding to the questions or are points conveyed through excessive use of quotations?
Organization - Is the paper well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are headings included in all papers longer than two pages?
Referencing (citations and references) - Does the paper include citations and quotation marks where appropriate? Are the references from the background readings and assignment present and properly cited? Are all the references listed in the bibliography present and referred to via citation?

7 Tips and Suggestions

Please note the following tips and suggestions:

Include a cover page and reference page, in addition to the 4-5 pages of analysis described above.
You are expected to demonstrate that you have read, understood, and can apply the required background readings for this module in your answer to this case. Be sure to read the required readings carefully, and use the theories and arguments you learn from them to support your analysis of Ms. Myers' situation and the recommendations for a more successful management style.
Cite your sources where you use them in the text of the paper, and only include sources in the reference list if you directly cited them in the text.
Include headings for all papers longer than two pages (basically all papers)
Cite AND reference all sources that you use in your work, including those that you paraphrase. This means include citations and quotation marks for direct quotes of more than five words, and include citations for information that you have "borrowed" or paraphrased from other sources.
Follow TUI Guidelines for well-written papers. (If you are unsure of what those guidelines are, see The Elements of a Well Written Paper).

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Article Critique
Name
Instructor
Course
Institution
Date
Article Critique
Introduction
After joining SK Telecom, Ms. Myers saw it as only her golden chance to work in a Korean Company, and proof her leadership ability by initiating goals that would make the company more global. However, everything took unexpected turn when she found herself not able to navigate her new work-environment. She was not given an official orientation, and her superiors did not give her a detailed guidance on how the organization operated. Moreover, her biggest challenge in the new opportunity was that her employer had a different view on what she thought her roles would be (Green, 2011). This paper intends to analyze Ms. Myers challenges while working at SK Telecom in South Korea using Hofstede's five dimensions of culture.
The first of the five dimensions of culture is social-orientation. This dimension involves a person's perceptions on the roles he/she should play. One extreme is of this dimension is individualism. Individualism is usually exhibited by western societies while the rest of the world adopts a free-market-based system. Anyone who embraces individualism tends to think of himself or herself first before anyone else. The other extreme of social-orientation is collectivism. Societies that adopt collectivism prefer group consensus instead of individual effort (Mueller, 2008). Considering the case at hand, Korean society embraces collectivism, unlike American society, which adopts individualism. When Ms. Myers joined SK Telecom, her primary objective was to make the organization more global. Her thoughts were centered on how she would execute her roles not how she would work with the rest of the staff to realize the organization's goals. Because of her individualistic view of issues, she found herself not concurring with her employer on what her roles would be. This posed a big challenge to her, and she found it hard to maneuver in her new work-environment.
The next dimensions is power-orientation. This dimension involves the perceptions that people have with regard to power/authority. This dimension involves two extremes, which include power-respect and power-tolerant cultures. Individuals in power-respect cultures accept power according to a person's ranking, and do not question the authority. On the other hand, individuals in the power-tolerant cultures frequently question the authority. From Ms. Myers case, it is clear that Koreans embraces Power-respect, while the Americans adopt a power-tolerant culture. Although the spokesperson of SK claimed that the company was among the first Korean companies to abolish hierarchic-management paving way for an open and vibrant administrative style, Ms. Myers could see four levels of management that included VP, director, manager, and work bee. She claims that employees only talked to people at their level. This clearly depicts a Power-respect culture. Moreover, M.s Myers being used to power-tolerant culture, she requests her workmates to call her â€œLindaâ€ instead of â€œSang Mu Lindaâ€. To her surprise, she plummeted in their eyes. Although she thought her administrative style was geared at involving everyone in the decision-making process, it was viewed as weak by her workmates. All these differences were encountered because of the power-respect culture of Koreans (Green, 2011).
The third dimension in H...

Updated on January 26, 2024

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order