Importance of Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investment
Global Corporate Governance Take-Home Exam/Essay Topics (50%)
This is a research essay. Please select ONE of the following topics. Since there are a huge number of articles on each topic, I have suggested some of the relevant articles here (in addition to the lecture reading materials) but further research is definitely needed.
Essay Topics:
1. Family Ownership
2. Gender Diversity in Australia
3. Directors’ Backgrounds and Governance Efficiency
4. Corporate Social Responsibility
Topic 1: Family Ownership How common is family ownership in today’s world (20%)? Is family ownership more beneficial or detrimental for minority shareholders (80%)? Related references: Anderson, R. C. & Reeb, D. M. (2003) Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang LHP. (2000) The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1,2): 81-112. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006) Business Groups and Their Types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 419-437. Gomez-Mejia LR, Makri M, Kintana ML. (2010) Diversification Decisions in Family- Controlled Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 223-252. Pedersen, T. & Thomsen, S. (2003) Ownership Structure and Value of the Largest European Firms: The Importance of Owner Identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 1(1), 27-55. Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino R, & Buchholtz AK. (2001) Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12: 99-116.
Topic 2: Board of Directors: Gender Diversity in Australia Examine the development and practices of gender diversity in the boardrooms of large (e.g., ASX100 or ASX 200) and medium-to-small publicly listed companies in Australia. What are the issues these organisations face in balancing gender diversity in the boardroom, and what are the possible recommendations for future development/improvement? • First part: Background information on gender diversity in the boardroom in Australian listed companies (30%); • Second part: The development, issues and challenges of balancing gender diversity in these organisations (40%); • Third part: Recommendations for future development in these organisations (30%). Related references: Adams, Renée, & Daniel Ferreira. (2009) Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2): 291–309. Brammer, S. Millington, A. & Pavelin, S. (2009) Corporate Reputation and Women on the Board. British Journal of Management, 20(1): 17-29. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G. (2003) Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. Financial Review, 38: 33-53. Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J.D. & Shrader, C.B. (2003) Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111. Hu, H.W. & Ali, P. (2013) Board Committees and IPO Survival: An Empirical Analysis. Company and Securities Law Journal (ABDC - A), 31: 49-55. Hu, H.W. & Tan, M.G. (2012) Corporate Governance and Initial Public Offering in Australia, In Corporate Governance and Initial Public Offerings (eds., Zattoni, A. & Judge, W.), 37-63, New York: Cambridge University Press. Jin, R., Jiang, X., & Hu, H.W. (online) Internal and external CSR in China: How do women independent directors matter? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1007/s10490-02109783. Kang, H., Cheng, M. & S.J. Gray (2007) Corporate Governance and. Board Composition: Diversity and Independence of Australian. Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2) 194-207. Yoshikawa, T. & Hu, H.W. (2017) Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Directors: An Integrated Framework of Director Role-identity and Boardroom Structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 99-109.
Topic 3: Directors’ Backgrounds and Governance Efficiency Whether and how directors’ different backgrounds affect boards’ governance quality (100%)? Discuss and explain your view. • First part: The roles and responsibilities of boards of directors (15%); • Second part: The governance characteristics of the different types of director backgrounds (e.g., academic background, finance/accounting background, political background) (50%); • Third part: The relationship between different types of director backgrounds (e.g., academic background, finance/accounting background, political background) and their boards’ performance and governance efficiency (35%). Related references: Boivie, S., Withers, M. C., Graffin, S. D., & Corley, K. G. (2021). Corporate directors’ implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards. Strategic Management Journal, 42(9), 1662-1695. Bonini, S., Deng, J., Ferrari, M., John, K., & Ross, D. G. (2022). Long‐tenured independent directors and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), 1602-1634. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of management review, 24(3), 489-505. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management review, 28(3), 383-396. Li, S., Quan, Y., Tian, G. G., Wang, K. T., & Wu, S. H. (2021). Academy fellow independent directors and innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-46. Marra, A. (2021). All that glitters is not gold! Independent directors’ attributes and earnings quality: Beyond formal independence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(6), 567-592. Rutherford, M. A., Buchholtz, A. K., & Brown, J. A. (2007). Examining the relationships between monitoring and incentives in corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(3), 414-430. Xiang, R., & Zhu, W. (2023). Academic independent directors and corporate fraud: evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(2), 285-303.
Topic 4: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Discuss the importance of environment, social, and governance (ESG) investment (40%). How does ESG investment strengthen firms’ CSR engagement (60%)? Related references: Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014) Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1-23. Garriga, E. & Melé, D. (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71. Giese, G., Lee, L.-E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019) Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk, and Performance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83. Hawn, O., Chatterjee, A., & Mitchell, M. L. (2018) Doe Investors Actually Value Sustainability? New Evidence From Investor Reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management Journal, 39(4): 949-976. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012) What Drives Corporate Social Performance? The Role of Nation-level Institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834-864. Lockett, A., Moon, J. & Visser, W. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115-136. Marquis C, Lee M, (2015) Who Is Governing Whom? Executives, Governance, and the Structure of Generosity in Large U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 483-497. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. S. (2001) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853-886. For all topics: Additional journals to visit: Corporate Governance: An International Review; Academy Management Journal; Journal of Business Ethics, among others
Corporate Social Responsibility
Name
Affiliation
Course Code
Due Date
Introduction In today's ever-evolving business landscape, companies face increasing pressure to go beyond profit-making and embrace a more comprehensive approach to corporate sustainability and social responsibility. This has given rise to the concept of environment, social, and governance (ESG) investment, which considers the impact of businesses on the environment, society, and their internal governance practices. This essay examines the importance of ESG investment in driving responsible business behavior and explores how it strengthens firms' engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts. By delving into these two questions, we will gain insights into the pivotal role that ESG investment plays in promoting sustainable practices and fostering a more socially conscious business environment. Discuss the importance of environment, social, and governance (ESG) investment The success and sustainability of businesses and communities are interconnected, making collaboration and mutually beneficial relationships essential for their growth and well-being. In light of these advantages, it is also important to consider the negative sides and what can be avoided. For example, a tobacco factory can provide most of the aforementioned advantages to a community but produce products that destroys lives. Thus, ESG seeks to deviate from the age-old premise that what is good for business is good for society. A new proposition of ‘what is good for society is good for business’ provides a more balanced frame of investing to ensure that businesses contribute to the greater good of the society and consider its direct and indirect effect before profits (Krishnamoorthy, 2021). There are several key advantages of considering environmental, social and governance issues before investing such as environmental impact. Today nearly everyone in the world has suffered directly or indirectly the effects of climatic change such as rise in global temperatures, more erratic and adverse weather conditions, heavier precipitation leading to floods, stronger natural disasters such as hurricanes etc. There is scientific consensus that climatic change has been caused by human factors especially around exploitation of natural resources such as oil and other human economic activities. Unsustainable environmental exploitation has also affected ecosystems. They have continually become fragile which among other adverse effects have led to extinction of many species. Thus, failing to consider the environmental footprint of a company before investing is supporting their environmentally destructive business processes (Spiliakos, 2018). Thus, ESG investing compels investors to consider the environmental footprint of a company or business before investing. What is legal is no longer enough, what is ethical is more important. Only the companies that actively work towards more sustainable future are worth investing. Such companies have a net zero or positive impact on the environment. They rely on renewable energy sources and have taken measurable and informed steps towards reducing their carbon emissions. Secondly, it is important for companies to consider the social impact of the companies they invest in. A business should actively work towards building a more equitable, sustainable, and inclusive society, leaving a lasting legacy that goes beyond financial success. This is for two main reasons; first, it is for long term sustainability. Companies exist within a broader social and economic ecosystem. The well-being and progress of the community in which a company operates directly affect its long-term viability. By contributing to social progress, companies help create a more stable and prosperous environment for their operations, customer base, and supply chains. When the community thrives, businesses have a greater opportunity for sustained success. Secondly, businesses are organic members of the society and they hold values and bound by ethics and must behave in prosocial ways (Serafeim, 2020). Businesses are not separate entities operating in isolation, but rather integral parts of the social fabric with responsibilities, values, and ethical responsibilities. Doing what is legal is no longer the bar, but what is ethical. Involvement in businesses that seek profits over social impact or grow at the expense of diluting the moral value of the society. Going beyond corporate social opportunity towards responsibility requires authentic long-term strategy driven by social impact (Bolton & Park, 2022). Like individuals, businesses have values and purposes that guide their decisions and actions. While profit generation is often a fundamental objective, many companies also have broader aspirations and commitments. These values may include integrity, sustainability, social responsibility, and innovation. Businesses are increasingly expected to align their actions with their stated values, both internally and externally, and demonstrate ethical behavior in their interactions with stakeholders. Thirdly, companies have the power and responsibility of being agents of change in the society. They should play an integral role in influencing the society to be more equitable and root out systemic problems that prevent its progress. A company has the potential to influence and shape societal governance structures. By actively participating in public policy discussions, engaging with government bodies, and collaborating with civil society organizations, businesses can contribute to the development of governance frameworks that support transparency, fairness, and sustainability. Companies that care about societal governance can drive positive change and advocate for policies that benefit both their business interests and the broader society. A company should advocate for policies that promote transparency, fairness and sustainability. The benefit of the society is the benefit of the company in the long term. Today there are many issues that companies must take a stand on; abortion, LGBTQI+ rights, etc. In the past, other companies took a stand of past social injustices such as slavery and today the society is better because they compelled authorities to dismantle the institutional concept of slavery. Investors who want to engineer social change invest in companies that believe they have a civil responsibility to shape public policy debated and contribute to the formation of laws and regulations that align with their values and benefit of the society as a whole. ESG investing emphasizes the importance of considering environmental, social, and governance factors before investing in businesses. It challenges the notion that what is good for business automatically benefits society and proposes a more balanced perspective: what is good for society is good for business. There are three key advantages of ESG investing. Firstly, the environmental impact of a company should be taken into account. Climate change has affected everyone, and unsustainable practices contribute to it. ESG investing encourages evaluating a company's environmental footprint and supporting those actively working towards a more sustainable future. Secondly, the social impact of companies is crucial. Businesses should contribute to building a more equitable and inclusive society, as their long-term viability depends on the well-being of the communities they operate in. Aligning actions with stated values and demonstrating ethical behavior is essential for businesses. Lastly, companies have the power to influence societal governance structures. By participating in public policy discussions and advocating for transparency, fairness, and sustainability, businesses can drive positive change. Investing in companies that prioritize ESG principles allows investors to support businesses that contribute to the greater good of society. In conclusion, ESG investing promotes a responsible approach to business growth and development, ensuring that businesses consider their environmental and social impact while also benefiting their own long-term success. How does ESG investment strengthen firms’ CSR engagement CSR is a company’s internal initiative that serves a corporate interest but manifested in doing good in the society and environment. Businesses and companies are integral parts of a community and they have a responsibility of promoting sustainability. Thus, companies become involved in making deliberate decisions to serve the interest of the community and the environment. On the other hand, ESG investment is careful consideration about the soul of a company and investing in the companies that have a net positive impact on the environment and society. Investors assess the company’s impact on the society to determine worthy investments. ESG investment reflects the ...