Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
1
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:
Effect of Co-evolutionary gaming on Group decision making (mgt 501 module 3 case assignment)
Essay Instructions:
read all attachments and make sure you follow the format of well wriiten papers. Please no plagrism because I will check.
In this module, you will be assessing your own personal conflict style and considering the situations in which the style might be helpful, and when it might be less than optimal—or even dysfunctional. Begin by logging on to the website below and completing the Conflict-Management Style Survey. Be sure to read the accompanying material that follows the survey.
1 Required Reading
The Leadership Center At Washington State University. (n.d.) Conflict-Management Style.http://www(dot)afc-ispi(dot)org/Repository/Conflict-Management%20survey.pdf
(Note that you need to have Acrobat Reader to be able to "read" this document. Acrobat Reader is available for free download from www(dot)Adobe(dot)com.)
2 Assignment
When you are done, compose a 2- to 3-page essay that addresses the following questions:
- What is your primary conflict management style? What is your least preferred style?
- In what types of conflict is your primary style likely to be appropriate? In what types of conflict situations is it likely to be dysfunctional? Explain why.
- What types of conflict situations are best handled by your lesser preferred styles?
- What steps can you take to increase your use of your lesser preferred styles in situations where they would be most beneficial, and decrease the use of preferred styles when they are likely to be dysfunctional?
3 Keys to the Assignment
The key aspects of this assignment that should be covered in your paper include:
- Complete the assessment according to the guidelines and interpret the results.
- Include the actual instrument and results.
- Based on your results, explain how you could improve your conflict management behaviors and under what conditions.
- Based on your results, explain how improving your conflict managment behaviors might translate into actual behaviors at the workplace? And what might be the results of such an improvement?
4 Assignment Expectations
Your paper will be evaluated on the following points:
- Precision - Does the paper address the question(s) or task(s)?
- Breadth - Is the full breadth of the subject, i.e., the Keys to the Assignment, addressed?
- Depth - Does the paper address the topic in sufficient depth and include the background readings and other background resources as references?
- Critical thinking - Is the subject thought about critically, i.e., accurately, logically, relevantly, and precisely?
- Clarity - Is the writing clear and are the concepts articulated properly? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding to the questions or are points conveyed through excessive use of quotations?
- Organization - Is the paper well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are headings included in all papers longer than two pages?
- Referencing (citations and references) - Does the paper include citations and quotation marks where appropriate? Are the references from the background readings and assignment present and properly cited? Are all the references listed in the bibliography present and referred to via citation?
- Application - Are the concepts of the module appropriately applied to the subject?
5 Tips and Suggestions
Please note the following tips and suggestions:
- Include a cover page and reference page in addition to the 2–3 pages of analysis described above.
- Include headings for all papers longer than two pages (basically all papers), but do not use headings as "space fillers."
- Cite and reference all sources that you use in your work, including those that you do not quote but paraphrase. This means include citations and quotation marks for direct quotes of more than five words, and include citations for information that you have "borrowed" or paraphrased from other sources.
- Follow TUI Guidelines for well-written papers. (If you are unsure of what those guidelines are, see The Elements of a Well Written Paper).
Submit your analysis by the end of this module.
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Effect of Co-evolutionary gaming on Group decision making
Name:
Institution:
Effect of Co-evolutionary gaming on Group decision making
Introduction
Effective and efficient Strategic management techniques are vital for any business with an aim of attaining success in today's world. Being a step ahead of competition in business equals attaining a leadership position for a firm in a specific industry, these requires the launching of offensive strategies and implementation of defensive mechanisms.
This paper's focus is derived from ‘Co-evolutionary War gaming,' which refers to an exceptional process of strategic planning used by the United States Department of Defense (DOD) to guide its operations. This model was however proposed for business practice application by Cares and Miskel (2007) as a tool for Strategic Management decision-making. This remarkable piece of study work indicates that strategic planning as done in the military world should not be based on current and predominant facts in addition to historical data regarding trends in business. The model depicts a keen view of decision making and planning from the realization that competition does not play a defensive, receptive or dormant role, rather, competition takes on a firm is positioning strategies like a duck to water. The article proposes that decision making ought not to be conducted in a ‘vacuum' (scenario of basing on past and current market circumstances), since the process will be characterized by lack of foresight and innovation thereby and still risk making the firm a victim of counter plans of the external environment. In fact, making decisions based on past and current information could easily result in outcomes that are worse than the predominant status quo.
The use of the technique of Co-evolutionary gaming facilitates foreseeing complex horizons within a firms reach; task-specific strategies are made flexible to enable accommodation of varied unexpected responses from an organization's environment with an anticipated approach. In other words, the organization stays prepared to deal with any forthcoming challenges even before they surface. As a result, this strategy blocks oppositions to the realization of a firm's objectives.
This paper recognizes that Co-evolutionary gaming technique goes a long way in enhancing group decision making. The process takes advantage of the varied backgrounds and diversity of group members to overcome challenges involved in decision-making. The technique readily acknowledges the existence of a wide range of possible scenarios and the importance of knowledge application as important aspects in effective decision-making. In addition, the fact that the process per se is a mechanism used to reach multiple decisions at the same time as with multiple outcomes, takes the edge off problems associated with group dynamics. As such, the co-evolutionary gaming technique coincidentally brings to the open weaknesses associated with group thinking and operation; this in turn provides the group with more capacity for rational decision-making than would be the case in normal individual making.
Organizations gain a wide range of relevant information for purposes of decision making by employing the technique of Co-evolutionary gaming, invol...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: