Painting & Philosophy: Ortega's Garden-Window Theory Of Art
Please read and analysis the readings carefully!(Especially Ortega's argument.)
INTRODUCTION
Consider Ortega's garden-window theory of art (as explained in the section of The Dehumanization of Art titled Artistic Art). There are two ways to interpret his
use of this idea. On the one hand, we can understand him as claiming that while in older art the two aspects of visual works of art went hand in hand, modern art
effects a separation. In other words, he could be saying that modern art is different from older art in that the emotional and aesthetic aspects can no longer be enjoyed together (or that the emotional aspect is altogether missing).
However, elsewhere in his essay (for instance on 25) he seems to be saying that art always had this double aspect, and hence that most people in the past only had the illusion of properly engaging with art: they were really fooling themselves or were misled somehow.
PROMPT I.
Modernism and the Garden-window Theory of art
Do two things:
A, take a position on this issue (i.e. decide which alternative reflects Ortega's view better) and argue for it conclusively demonstrating familiarity with and profound understanding of Ortega's argument as a whole. (You may, but need not invoke Alberti, Diderot or Berenson as providing alternative ideas for
understanding the relationship between emotional and aesthetic aspects of works of older art, for instance by invoking their idea that art is both for the educated and the uneducated).
B. Evaluate what you have now established as Ortega's view by reference to one of the three following modernist works
Georges Seurat: A Sunday Afternoon on the Ile Grande Jatte (1884-86) https://www(dot)wga(dot)hu/support/viewer_m/z.html
Pablo Picasso: Les demoiselles d'Avignon (1907) https://www(dot)moma(dot)org/learn/moma_learning/pablo-picasso-les-demoiselles-davignon-paris-june-july-1907
Claude Monet: Water Lilies (c. 1920, MoMA, New York) https://www(dot)wga(dot)hu/html_m/m/monet/08/7liliy08.html
“Evaluation” means critical evaluation: you should consider whether your reading of the work of art in question confirms or questions your reading of Ortega's general theory. (You are welcome to choose an alternative Modernist work, but you need to confirm it with me! Also, you may use further works from Monet's Water Lilies series (painted in his own garden in Giverny in the twenties), and you are welcome to refer to this video if you notice something analytically relevant: https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=BJE4QUNgaeg )
Make sure that the two parts of your essay are united by a single thread and by a clear focus on a problem, issue, or question – this is an important part of the task!
Painting & Philosophy
Name:
Institution:
Painting & Philosophy (Ortega’s garden-window theory of art).
Art and painting are key areas that have experienced growth based on the invention of different concepts and inventions across the globe. Art audience also needs various aspects that make the painting piece of art have an appealing visual taste to the target audience. Artists also make significant use of the artistic prowess and expertise to educate the audience, entertain and use different means to pass their art ideas to the public. The look at a painting gives one different idea as people argue out that pictures speak a thousand words. Creativity is important as it ensures that people have a variety of ideas presented skillfully to the target audience. Ortega’s garden-window theory of art is a pivotal paradigm that helps artists enhance their painting works. Self-portrait is one of the revolutionary discovery and invention that played a crucial role in improving art across the globe. The reason behind the above argument is that most of the artists felt challenged to improve their art skills and expertise in attempt to producing better art pieces. The essay discusses painting and philosophy Ortega’s garden-window theory of art.
Jose Ortega y Gasset is one of the great personalities who reviewed art under the field of painting quite significantly. The reason behind the argument is that Ortega developed a theoretical framework that helped most of the people understand more about the dehumanization of art I 1925 through the garden-window theory of art (Ortega, 1925). The theory studies art from a deep sociological perspective, which gives details on the way art and paintings, ought to appear in an attempt to advance the art that most of the painters produced. Pablo Picasso was one of the milestone artists who ensured that painting advanced through the concept of cubism, which helped enhanced most of the global art pieces that the painters produced across the globe. The theory purports for art to move from the ancient art that most of the human beings viewed as art to the modern art that few people rendered as the ultimate forms of art. Scholars that have artwork that closely relates to the perception of Ortega argue that art is progressive and most of the artists are innovative in their work to set standards and produced improved types of work (Bal, 2013). From the aspect of progressions, most of the artists’ work and produced improved pieces as compared to the previous works they had produced, which brings forth the aspect of dehumanization as seen through Ortega’s theory. Based on the above reasons, the garden-window theory of art is quite important as it expounds on the aspect of dehumanization in art.
The garden-window theory of art is important as it expounds on what makes modern art unique. One of the prime factors that make modern art unique is it that the paintings in modern art represent literal human as compared to most of the ancient arts that incorporated representational qualities (Ortega, 1925). The representation of literal human was a revolutionary step that ensured that artist improved on the type of artwork they produced to their targeted publics. The other uniqueness was that most pieces inclusive of the modern art were captivating, and they captured the audience through visualization. After an artist is through with his or her work, the artist needs to ensure that the work is attractive to the targeted audience as the audience are the targeted group that the artists need to ensure that they have the ultimate satisfaction with artists’ work (Fragassom & Masini, 2011). Making of artworks that amuse the target audience is one of the key objectives of artists across the globe as in the case where one produces appealing work; most of the audience gets attracted and feel compelled to buy the art pieces. Through the above reasons, Ortega’s theory is important as it expresses uniqueness in the modern art.
The Italian painters are also effectually in the definition of the art philosophy. The reason behind the argument is that most of the Italian painters embraced modern art aspects to ensure that artwork was remarkable. The Italian artists had good sculptures that most of the art audience liked. Sculptors and paintings are some of the important pieces of art that global audience appreciates as they are attractive and one can pass his or her intellectual ideas to the target audience the person aims at reaching (Brown, 2015). Despite the fact that most people never supported modern art, the few that believed in the uniqueness of modern art, including Ortega fought to ensure painters and artists embraced most of the modern art aspects across the globe. Most of the scholars argue out that modern art dehumanizes art as it defies most of the artistic set rules to ensure that the artist has the latitude he or she needs to ex...