Essay Available:
page:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
0
Style:
Other
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:
Feedback on the Essay About the Government Use of UCH
Coursework Instructions:
Review the media piece "Peer Review Using Rubrics” found within the list of Topic 6 resources (to the right).
Follow the directions outlined in the media piece to complete this learning activity which is designed to provide practice using a rubric when peer reviewing a paper.
Review the first draft of the person who posted his/her first draft directly above yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is still the first student post at the top of the forum by Saturday, review the last draft posted at the bottom of the forum.
Complete the Peer Review Worksheet for the essay draft you reviewed.
Please submit the completed worksheet to two places.
As an attachment in a reply to your peer’s essay in the peer review forum.
As a normal assignment submission.
Review the criteria at the bottom of the Peer Review Worksheet to ensure successful completion of this assignment.
Coursework Sample Content Preview:
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
-3810166675The paper's thesis suggests that the US government should implement UCH to lessen the spread of germs, increase the quality of life, and reduce social inequality. Accessible and affordable healthcare may enable earlier intervention and limit risks associated with the spread of germs. Moreover, the paper advocates that access to UHC would lead to everyone receiving medical treatment and the help they need at any cost. Furthermore, Social inequality is widely affected by the healthcare received across the globe. Generally, The nation's overall health would benefit from a system of UHC, and pandemics would not scar the nation as much as it has in the past.00The paper's thesis suggests that the US government should implement UCH to lessen the spread of germs, increase the quality of life, and reduce social inequality. Accessible and affordable healthcare may enable earlier intervention and limit risks associated with the spread of germs. Moreover, the paper advocates that access to UHC would lead to everyone receiving medical treatment and the help they need at any cost. Furthermore, Social inequality is widely affected by the healthcare received across the globe. Generally, The nation's overall health would benefit from a system of UHC, and pandemics would not scar the nation as much as it has in the past.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Target and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criterion. Then use the right-hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Persuasive Essay Rubric
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Insufficient
3: Approaching
4: Acceptable
5: Target
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
84%
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Evidence/Informed Position
GED3C3
Make informed decisions based on historical, current, reliable, and valid information
30%
No evidence is used to document that the decision on the position was informed on reliable, historical, or valid information.
Presents minimal evidence to support the decided position on an issue. Not all evidence is relevant to the specific position or stance chosen. Fewer than three outside sources are used. No Peer reviewed sources used.
Presents minimal evidence to support the decided position on an issue. Not all evidence is relevant to the specific position or stance chosen. At least three outside sources are used with at least one peer-reviewed journal article.
Presents key evidence to support the decided position on an issue through a synthesis of paraphrased and quoted material. Research is mostly based on relevant and valid information. Three sources are used. At least two peer reviewed journal articles are used.
Presents key evidence to support the decided position on an issue through a synthesis of paraphrased research based on historical, current, reliable, and valid information. At least three peer reviewed journal articles are used. Direct quotes are minimal.
The rationale for score:
30%
The paper gives a figure of 76000 individuals who could be saved if UCH was functioning. A peer-reviewed article cites the information. There are three peer-reviewed articles used.
Critical Thinking Application
GED3C2
Apply appropriate critical inquiry strategies (e.g., inductive, and deductive reasoning, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis) to issues and questions.
30%
Does not apply critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected. The writer relies entirely on their personal experience and/or feelings to justify their position on the issue.
Applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected erroneously. Internal reflection on the issue displays potential trouble maintaining objectivity. Opposing viewpoints are incomplete or inaccurate. Works to identify the main points of the issue. Essay may lack in its persuasiveness due to errors in managing emotion and avoiding fallacies within the essay.
Applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected with some errors. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. Opposing viewpoints may not be completely clear. Identifies the main points of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulative by managing emotion and avoiding fallacies with few errors.
Applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected with minimal errors. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. An opposing viewpoint is considered. Identifies not only the main points, but also some of the embedded, implicit, or unspoken aspects of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulative by managing emotion and avoiding fallacies with minimal errors.
Accurately applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. Opposing viewpoints are considered. Identifies not only the main points, but also the embedde...
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
-3810166675The paper's thesis suggests that the US government should implement UCH to lessen the spread of germs, increase the quality of life, and reduce social inequality. Accessible and affordable healthcare may enable earlier intervention and limit risks associated with the spread of germs. Moreover, the paper advocates that access to UHC would lead to everyone receiving medical treatment and the help they need at any cost. Furthermore, Social inequality is widely affected by the healthcare received across the globe. Generally, The nation's overall health would benefit from a system of UHC, and pandemics would not scar the nation as much as it has in the past.00The paper's thesis suggests that the US government should implement UCH to lessen the spread of germs, increase the quality of life, and reduce social inequality. Accessible and affordable healthcare may enable earlier intervention and limit risks associated with the spread of germs. Moreover, the paper advocates that access to UHC would lead to everyone receiving medical treatment and the help they need at any cost. Furthermore, Social inequality is widely affected by the healthcare received across the globe. Generally, The nation's overall health would benefit from a system of UHC, and pandemics would not scar the nation as much as it has in the past.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Target and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criterion. Then use the right-hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Persuasive Essay Rubric
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Insufficient
3: Approaching
4: Acceptable
5: Target
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
84%
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Evidence/Informed Position
GED3C3
Make informed decisions based on historical, current, reliable, and valid information
30%
No evidence is used to document that the decision on the position was informed on reliable, historical, or valid information.
Presents minimal evidence to support the decided position on an issue. Not all evidence is relevant to the specific position or stance chosen. Fewer than three outside sources are used. No Peer reviewed sources used.
Presents minimal evidence to support the decided position on an issue. Not all evidence is relevant to the specific position or stance chosen. At least three outside sources are used with at least one peer-reviewed journal article.
Presents key evidence to support the decided position on an issue through a synthesis of paraphrased and quoted material. Research is mostly based on relevant and valid information. Three sources are used. At least two peer reviewed journal articles are used.
Presents key evidence to support the decided position on an issue through a synthesis of paraphrased research based on historical, current, reliable, and valid information. At least three peer reviewed journal articles are used. Direct quotes are minimal.
The rationale for score:
30%
The paper gives a figure of 76000 individuals who could be saved if UCH was functioning. A peer-reviewed article cites the information. There are three peer-reviewed articles used.
Critical Thinking Application
GED3C2
Apply appropriate critical inquiry strategies (e.g., inductive, and deductive reasoning, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis) to issues and questions.
30%
Does not apply critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected. The writer relies entirely on their personal experience and/or feelings to justify their position on the issue.
Applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected erroneously. Internal reflection on the issue displays potential trouble maintaining objectivity. Opposing viewpoints are incomplete or inaccurate. Works to identify the main points of the issue. Essay may lack in its persuasiveness due to errors in managing emotion and avoiding fallacies within the essay.
Applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected with some errors. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. Opposing viewpoints may not be completely clear. Identifies the main points of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulative by managing emotion and avoiding fallacies with few errors.
Applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected with minimal errors. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. An opposing viewpoint is considered. Identifies not only the main points, but also some of the embedded, implicit, or unspoken aspects of the issue. Upholds persuasive tone rather than manipulative by managing emotion and avoiding fallacies with minimal errors.
Accurately applies critical inquiry through inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, and evaluation of evidence collected. Internal reflection on the issue is evident. Opposing viewpoints are considered. Identifies not only the main points, but also the embedde...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Importance of Christ’s Divinity and Humanity in Christianity
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | Other | Literature & Language | Coursework |
-
Theme and the Principal Characters of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-32)
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | Other | Literature & Language | Coursework |
-
Memo to Administration: Request for Shift Change
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | Other | Literature & Language | Coursework |