100% (1)
page:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
Other
Subject:
Creative Writing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools

Coursework Instructions:
Focus: Critical Thinking & Analysis of a Source The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools- book This is a two part assignment. Make sure you read both parts of the assignment and respond to both. The TedTalk and reading in the Critical Thinking Guide are used for both parts. Part 1: Analyzing the Logic of a Presentation First read pages 28 to 38 in the Critical Thinking Guide. Then view the TedTalk by Dan Cohen titled "For argument's sake". Watch this tedtalk at least twice he moves through information quickly, take some notes. Then go to page 29 in the Critical Thinking Guide and apply the "Template for Analyzing the Logic of an Article" to Cohen's tedtalk. For example: 1. The main purpose of this tedtalk is ___________________________. 2. The key question the speaker is addressing is ____________________________________. (Type out each numbered item 1 through 8 and fill in the blanks as you go, until you have completed all 8). Part 2. Comparison and Contrast Analysis of two sources Consider the remaining pages in the assigned reading p. 30-38 in context of what Cohen is saying about why we argue and why we need new arguments. Then write a short paragraph on what you find in these pages that reflects, explains, refutes or contradicts what Cohen is asserting, and explain why. Use specifics from both source in making this comparison and contrast analysis.
Coursework Sample Content Preview:
The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools Your Name Subject and Section Professor’s Name April 18, 2025 Part 1: Analyzing the Logic of Daniel H. Cohen’s TED Talk 1 The central objective of this TED Talk is to present a fresh argument perspective by shifting the understanding from competitive battles into intellectual development prospects. 2 The main issue explored by the speaker centers on the reasons behind disagreements and methods to create beneficial arguments that benefit both sides. 3 The essence of this presentation consists of three argument models—war, proof, and performance—as explained by Cohen and his critique of the war framework as the primary metaphor. 4 The evaluation demonstrates that arguments become warlike when treated this way, hindering productive discussions and educational growth while producing ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!