100% (1)
page:
1 pages/≈275 words
Sources:
0
Style:
Other
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.75
Topic:

Communication

Coursework Instructions:

Answer the following question in 100 words or LESS.



You’re sitting in a restaurant enjoying a meal when two men at a nearby table start fighting. Well, it really isn’t a fight but more of an argument. Well, it really isn’t an argument but more of a discussion. Okay, you were eavesdropping but for good reason. At the nearby table sits Charles Berger and Eric Eisenberg. Charles tells Eric that people communicate to reduce uncertainty (or manage it) while Eric tells Charles that people have a need to be strategically ambiguous when communicating. Your job is to resolve the issue by (1) showing that you understand both theories while (2) offering your perspective of what makes the most sense based on the two theories (3) that provides a real example from your life experiences that proves that your perspective is highly effective.



Examples will be on attached files 



Strategic Ambiguity:

https://www(dot)questia(dot)com/library/journal/1G1-19527181/the-ethics-of-strategic-ambiguity#/



Uncertainty Reduction:

https://www(dot)utwente(dot)nl/cw/theorieenoverzicht/Theory%20clusters/Interpersonal%20Communication%20and%20Relations/Uncertainty_Reduction_Theory/

Coursework Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:
Communication
Uncertainty reduction is commonly used when conversing with a person and there is need for clarity. As such, one asks question regarding a certain element and observes while listening to the response given by the other party. This way, one is able to assess the situation or the idea in discussion relative to the party’s response. In strategic ambiguity, the speaker only gives out pieces of information to the listener, to help them form simple answers about what it is that they were enquiring about, and they control what they tell the listener as the conversation continues.
Uncertainty reduction and strategic ambiguity are crucial in conversations. There isn’t a clear line that can be used to define the importance of either of the techniques given that, every scenario requires different measures of the two. As such, the importance of either of the techniques depends on the situation, the person that one is talking to and also the skills of the communicators. If the situation requires clarity, then the speaker will most likely use the uncertainty technique for clarity. In case the speaker does not want to give too much information, they will use the strategic ambiguity.
In an example, if a close friend bought you an expensive phone on your ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!