NEW CPP + DEADLINE Forgiving yourself, is it important?

NEEDED A SAMPLE BUSINESS LETTER Peer Assessment #3 Due: Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:59pmDue: Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:59pm Access your peers essay using the same process you used for the previous round of peer assessments.Links to an external site. In addition to using broad strokes to identify higher/lower/order writing concerns, I've listed some guiding questions that should help with both your annotations as well as your business letters. Confirm that the thesis does not arrive until after the narration section AND that you are able to discern all three reasons. If you are unable to confirm this, indicate to your peer that the thesis is not in the correct place and/or the reasoning is not clear. Provide some specific advice for revision. Confirm that the action your peer is recommending is a tangible action ("open the door for someone") and not a life-long endeavor ("practice kindness"). If they do have a life-long endeavor, encourage them to think about the first step. For example, if one your peers is recommending that their classmates "educate themselves" on the topic of mental health, you'll want to remind them that even mental health experts are not experts until years of practice. Instead, you will want to ask your peer "what is the first step?" Can they recommend a book? A podcast? A class? That first step--the tangible action--should be the thesis statement, not the value or the life-long endeavor. How effectively has your peer focused their topic? How could the improve the focus? For each of the confirmation paragraphs, analyze the clarity and depth of the peer's stance. How effectively does your peer support reason A? Reason B? Reason C? Provide feedback on how well the evidence for each reason supports the claim. In other words, does the evidence provided to support reason A actually support the claim being made? Can you offer additional evidence for your peer to consider? How effectively does the writer integrate sources, quotes, data, or examples to bolster their argument? How well does the writer address potential counterarguments or opposing viewpoints? How well does the author refute those counterarguments? Assess the overall coherence and use of transitions between both sentences and paragraphs. Can you find evidence of the known-new contract where relevant? Where specifically could the writer improve the coherence of the piece? Discuss the extent to which it is clear that the writer is writing for a reader and not just for an assignment. In other words, where do you see evidence of a conscious writer? Where could the writer be more conscious of the needs of their reader? Offer feedback on your peer's use of MLA citation; let them know that easybib.comLinks to an external site. if their friend and it will generate their works cited page for them as long as they do not just copy and paste website links into the generator. Point out any instances where source integration lacks clarity or cohesion within the essay's flow? How effectively do the signal phrasesLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader integrate source material without disrupting the flow of the writer's argument? Is there a Works Cited page included, and does it adhere to the MLA format guidelines? Are all cited sources accurately listed on the Works Cited page in alphabetical order? Do the Works Cited entries contain all the necessary information required for MLA format (authors, titles, publication details, etc.)? Step 3: Write your business letter Use the answers to your guiding questions to draft a 300 word business letter that addresses your feedback. Be sure to reference specific places in the essay so that your peers can target their revision. Avoid answering the questions above in a list format. Create a thoughtful and cohesive piece of writing with a beginning, a middle and an end. Step 4: Submit your business letter. Attach the business letter to the submission (just as we did last time) and type "done" in the comment box.