M2 Discussion: Theory and Family Post Responses

Please respond to 4 classmates posts. The follow up posts are an opportunity for you to ask questions, share your opinions, support your responses with additional resources, and provide feedback to your classmates. In your replies to others, go beyond offering affirmation and agreement, by adding new perspective, asking thoughtful questions, and where needed link to the readings. Textbook: Gosselin, D. K. (2019). Family and intimate partner violence: Heavy hands. 1. Joy Adeyemi posted: This page automatically marks posts as read as you scroll.Adjust automatic marking as read setting Deterrence theory is rooted in the concept that punishment discourages crime. I find the theory interesting because it resonates with individuals across the spectrum of life. In the context of specific deterrence, interventions target individuals to prevent a specific crime. Studies indicate a decrease in repeat offenses, especially among those with a stake in adhering to the law (Gosselin, 2019). I think California’s 3 strikes law could serve as an example of deterrence theory, as it highlights how individuals are motivated to avoid committing additional offenses for fear of lifetime imprisonment. General deterrence is when non-offenders are influenced by the punishment of offenders. The example provided by Gosselin depicts someone refraining from violence during an argument due to the fear consequences. While theorists emphasize the need for comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the success of deterrence, I believe the practical application of this theory requires a logical approach. Emotionally volatile individuals may not necessarily consider the consequences of their actions, which is a factor not accounted for by deterrence. The theory assumes both a rational processing of emotions as well as forethought. I believe understanding the dynamics of deterrence theory can inform prevention strategies and interventions if used in tandem with other theories that account for predisposition (behavior and environment). Reference: Gosselin, D. K. (2019). Family and intimate partner violence: Heavy hands (6th ed.). Pearson. 2. Sheneke Cowell posted: This page automatically marks posts as read as you scroll.Adjust automatic marking as read setting M2 Discussion: Theory and Family Violence The theory I find interesting is Deterrence theory. Deterrence theory is defined as immediate punishment for a crime committed. The theory leaves no room for the crime to be committed multiple times as the perpetrator will receive swift punishment. Recidivism is reduced in some instances of family violence; the reduction appears highest for those who have a more significant stake in conformity. (Gosselin, 2019 pg.68) The deterrence theory serves many purposes within the family, clear expectations by establishing family rules and setting accountability, set boundaries by establishing accountability and personal responsibility and lastly when parents model good behavior deterrence theory helps the family as well. If during an argument, a person walks away muttering, “You are not worth it,” and holds himself or herself back when he or she might otherwise have swung out in anger. (Gosselin, 2019 pg.68) The more family enforcements of rules and consequences fosters a sense of fairness and accountability among family members, reducing conflicts and promoting harmony within the family unit. Reference: Gosselin, D. K. (2019). Family and intimate partner violence: Heavy hands (6th ed.).Pearson. 3. Erica Hunter posted: The pathology and psychology-based theories contained a wealth of information that I felt would be beneficial to some of the families I work closely with. It focused on the possible impacts—both good and bad—that a person may have from the social aspects of their early experiences. A psychodynamic approach made it clear to me—as someone who was abused as a child and raised in a violent household—that I am not responsible for the things that happened to me. Given that it upholds the idea that reality is socially and culturally constructed, it is closely associated with social constructivism (Gosselin, 2018, p. 69). According to Payne (2005) the relationships and interactions between individuals and groups play a role in shaping our perceptions of reality and impact how we feel and behave externally (Simple Search, n.d.) According to Kurt-Swanger & Petcosky (2003), "theories are explored within micro, meso, and macro levels of analysis and include: psychiatric/psychopathological models; and socio-psychological theories such as social conflict theory, power theory, resource theory, exchange/social control theory, symbolic interactionist theory, social learning theory, and traumatic bonding theory." (Kurst-Swanger & Petcosky, 2003). The availability and willingness of the subject to acknowledge their involvement in a violent situation is a crucial component of the research process. This willingness to disclose information about violent experiences can vary depending on a variety of factors, including culture, interviewer training, sensitivity, questioning style, and environment (National Center for Biotechnology Information, n.d.-b). According to Alfred Adler's Theory of Individual Psychology, people are primarily driven by social interests and a desire for superiority or self-improvement. Childhood experiences, particularly feelings of inferiority, create this drive, but in a healthy individual, it takes the form of a desire to improve the welfare of others. When this drive becomes self-centered or when feelings of inferiority become overwhelming, maladaptive behaviors occur (Simply Psychology, 2024). Gosselin, D. K. (2018). Family and intimate partner violence: Heavy Hands. Kurst-Swanger, K., & Petcosky, J. L. (2003). Theoretical perspectives. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 26–54). https://doi(dot)org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165180.003.0002 National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.-b). https://www(dot)ncbi(dot)nlm(dot)nih(dot)gov/ Simple search. (n.d.). https://www(dot)diva-portal(dot)org/ Simply Psychology. (2024, January 12). Simply Psychology | Self-Care, Theories, Famous Studies & More. https://www(dot)simplypsychology(dot)org/ 4. Jill Potter posted: I found all the theories for explaining family violence in Chapter 3 of Gosselin’s text interesting and relevant. In my personal experience in my family and in my work with high-risk adults, I witness that often there are multiple causes of violent behavior. It is difficult to isolate one from another. For this assignment, I chose Intergenerational Transmission Theory as the most interesting theory because I see how generations of family violence have such a devastating effect on the individuals that I work with. This theory is in my opinion one of the simplest to explain. Gosselin states that in the case of intergenerational transmission, that family violence is handed down from one generation to another. Members of a family view and use violence as an acceptable way to resolve conflict. Family members learn, rather than inherit, abusive tendencies through repeatedly experiencing violence as part of their upbringing. (Gosselin, 2019.) An article I found online informs of the impact of family violence on a child’s cognitive development, suggesting that a child becomes violent based on their belief that violent behavior is normal and appropriate. Their experiences of violence as a form of conflict resolution becomes part of their value system. Additionally, parents who behave violently toward their children create attachment issues in their children, thus preventing them from forming an appropriate relationship with their parents. (Meyer et al., 2021) How can this information be used to help families? In my opinion, if a behavior can be learned, it can be unlearned. The mention of the cognitive impact of family violence on individuals to me implies that a cognitive behavioral therapy approach might be effective to teach healthy ways to resolve conflict. References: Gosselin, D. K. (2019). Family and intimate partner violence: Heavy hands. Pearson Meyer, S., Reeves, E., & Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2021). The intergenerational transmission of family violence: Mothers’ perceptions of children’s experiences and use of violence in the home. https://www(dot)thelancet(dot)com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(19)30147-6/fulltext