Is nationwide on your side?

I would argue that Nationwide is not on our side. This company is more focused on keeping its money rather than helping the family of the aggrieved. According to the facts, it can be observed that D.V.G entered a contract with Nationwide and State Farm, but these companies argues that D.V.G is a minor, therefore the contract is void. However, according to the court statement, It is well settled by the authorities that infants are not liable on any of their contracts, except for necessaries. The situation of D.V.G is a necessary. However, there should also be a consideration of the statement where in all other contracts of minors, whether it be executory or already executed, may only be avoided or ratified at the election of the infant. This is from H and S Homes, L.L.C v. McDonald, 823, S. 2d, 627, 630 (Ala. 2001) quoting Harris Raughton. This counters the argument by the insurance...