Week 3 Discussion: Resilience and Change. Coursework

Two references are required, required reading is listed below. Rubric to follow for grading is also listed. If you need further please let me know. Thank you.



Purpose

This week's graded topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO).

CO4: Integrates clinical nursing judgment using effective communication strategies with patients, colleagues, and other healthcare providers. (PO#4)



Directions

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate scholarly resources

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric as you compose your answers.



Discussion Questions

Change is part of our daily healthcare environment. Clinical nursing judgments based on quality and safety, as well as protocols and standards, reflect our patient-centered care values.

What steps could you take to develop more resilience in your practice setting?

How might you communicate a change in practice to patients and nursing peers?



Assigned Reading/Articles

American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice (3rd ed.).

p. 21-24



Scope of Nursing Practice (The Where of Nursing Practice from: Healthy Work Environments for Nursing Practice thru Supports for Healthy Work Environments)



Required Article Garcia-Izquierdo, M., Meseguer de Pedro, M., Rio-Risqez, I., & Soler Sanchez, I. (2018). Resilience as a moderator of psychological health in situations of chronic stress (burnout) in a sample of hospital nurses. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(2), 228-236. https://chamberlainuniversity(dot)idm(dot)oclc(dot)org/login?url=https://search(dot)ebscohost(dot)com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=29266720&site=eds-live&scope=site

(Links to an external site.)

Required Website

The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare.(2012). Creating a safety culture [Video file]. https://www(dot)centerfortransforminghealthcare(dot)org/why-work-with-us/video-resources/creating-a-safety-culture

(Links to an external site.)

Additional Background Reading and Resources

Thomas, T. W., Seifert, P. C., & Joyner, J. C. (2016). Registered nurses leading innovative changes. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(3). https://chamberlainuniversity(dot)idm(dot)oclc(dot)org/login?url=https://search(dot)ebscohost(dot)com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=118680232&site=eds-live&scope=site

(Links to an external site.)

Smith, M. C. (1988). Roy's adaptation model in practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1(3), 97-98. https://chamberlainuniversity(dot)idm(dot)oclc(dot)org/login?url=https://search(dot)ebscohost(dot)com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107533568&site=eds-live&scope=site

(Links to an external site.)

Congress.gov. (n. d.). The legislative process: Overview [Video file]. https://www(dot)congress(dot)gov/legislative-process

(Links to an external site.)





Discussion Board Rubric 9_19

Discussion Board Rubric 9_19

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Answers the initial graded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.







16.0 pts

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.





14.0 pts

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.





12.0 pts

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.





0.0 pts

Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).



16.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited. ( APA format not required)







12.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support your discussion from: assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.





10.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion from: assigned readings OR online lesson. Sources are credited.





9.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.





0.0 pts

Does not integrate any evidence.



12.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.







14.0 pts

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.





12.0 pts

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.





10.0 pts

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.





0.0 pts

No response post to another student or instructor.



14.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Communicates in a professional manner.







8.0 pts

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).





7.0 pts

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).





6.0 pts

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).





0.0 pts

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).



8.0