HCR-literature Resource Table

Student Name: Topic: NURS 4300 Literature Resource Table Guidelines: 1 Each student (Individual Assignment) must choose 8 research articles related to their research focus. Four Of these may be from your articles that you critiqued and turned in. So, you should have a minimum of (1-Quantitative article; 1-Qualitative article; 1-SLR with MA;1- Mixed Methods Study; and four other studies) 2 Work should be original and not cited word-by-word from the research articles. Points will be deducted from the assignment for Turnitin scores > 35% (1 point off/%> 35%; excluding original citations). 3 Submit to the appropriate drop box by the due date. YOU MUST SUBMIT THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT IN ADDITION TO THE FULL PDF’S OF ALL 8 ARTICLES LABLED ARTICLE 1, ARTICLE 2, ETC. YOU WILL LOSE POINTS IF THIS IS NOT DONE. Grading Criteria: Criteria Comments Grade Format /APA Reference Citation/Current Resources (20%) Purpose of Study(10%) Research Approach Identified /Study design(15%) Interventions/Variables (10%) Sample size, and Descriptive characteristics (20%) Contribution to Nursing /Research focus (25%) Final Grade: Questions to consider when completing the assignment: 1 Is this a research article that is current (< 10 years)? Have I reviewed APA format for documenting references? 2 What is the purpose of the research? What is the question the researcher is asking? 3 What research approach was employed in this research study? Quantitative? Qualitative? Mixed Methods? Provide rationale for your decision. 4 What was the design of the study? Narrative? Quasi-experimental? Randomized control trial? Mixed Methods concurrent? 5 What was the sample size? What are the characteristics of the sample population? You will find this under the Analysis/Findings section (usually Table 1). You MUST describe your sample population. For example: 25% male, 30% live in TN, etc. 6 How does this research contribute to the body of knowledge in the discipline? What are the limitations? What areas need to be explored? TO NOTE: ALONG WITH YOUR TABLE, YOU MUST DROP FULL PDF-ATTACHMENTS OF ALL 8 ARTICLES. PLEASE NAME/LABEL EACH ARTCLE (Article 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8) REFERENCE CITATION (APA format) No hanging indent is needed PURPOSE OF THE STUDY/RESEARCH QUESTION RESEARCH APPROACH: QUANT, QUAL, MIXED METHODS (provide rationale) STUDY DESIGN WITHIN RESEARCH APPROACH INTERVENTIONS/ VARIABLES SAMPLE: SIZE AND DESCRIPTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF SAMPLE HOW ARTICLES CONTRIBUTES TO TOPIC WITH LIMITATIONS/AREAS FOR FURTHER STUDY Scott, E., Shehata, M., Panesar, A., Summers, C., & Dale, J. (2022). The Low Carb Program for people with type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes: A mixed methods feasibility study of signposting from general practice. BJGP open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0137. This research is designed to evaluate the viability of a low-carb diet program for individuals with diabetes type 2 comparing its applicability as a health aid in general practice. Scott et al. (2022) uses a mixed research design that combines quantitative and qualitative studies to evaluate the feasibility of adopting the Low Carb Program for the T2DM/Pre-diabetes population. This approach incorporates quantitative program compliance and clinical parameters results alongside the participants’ qualitative self-reporting on the program’s accessibility and efficacy when delivered through general practice contexts. Combined with quantitative methods, this approach increases credibility, the richness of the data collected and the subjects’ experience. Intervention: Low-carb diet program enrollment, usage of an app Sample: n=351; Diverse age, gender, and baseline HbA1c levels Scott et al. (2022) expand the evidence base about the integration of signposting for a Low Carb intervention program for persons with diabetes type 2 and prediabetes, highlighting the benefits of glycaemic control and patient satisfaction using a mixed-methods approach. Thus, the study has implications for diet-based interventions within primary care diabetes management. However, there are also several limitations of the study; the number of participants that took part in the research is limited, and the duration of the study was relatively short. Hence, the generalization of the findings might be a little off, and long-term effectiveness cannot be determined. More research is required to assess long-term dietary compliance, clinical performance at a longer term, and patient experience regarding program accessibility and implementation. Yost, O., DeJonckheere, M., Stonebraker, S., Ling, G., Buis, L., Pop-Busui, R., ... & Richardson, C. (2020). Continuous glucose monitoring with low-carbohydrate Diet Coaching in adults with prediabetes: mixed methods pilot study. JMIR Diabetes 5(4), e21551. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21551. In the study, a mixed-method research design was used to establish the effect of CGM and low-carb diet coaching on prediabetes individuals. Yost et al. (2020) include quantitative measures, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)metrics, confirmed here with qualitative participant feedback in a pilot study. This approach enables the researchers to capture on one hand the changes of glucose status due to low-carbohydrate diet coaching, and on the other, the participants’ perception of the practicality and efficiency of the intervention. These data forms together present a multifaceted view of the role of CGM in managing prediabetes using diet modification. Variables: Continuous glucose levels, coaching sessions, dietary adherence Sample: n=15; Adults with prediabetes, varied adherence to low-carb diet Yost et al. (2020) present vital knowledge and findings on continuous glucose monitoring as an intervention added to a low-carbohydrate diet for adults with prediabetes. Based on this study, CGM might assist patients in being mindful of their state and thus adhering to dietary guidelines as desired, which, therefore, improves glycemic control. The intervention of ongoing blood glucose scrutiny amalgamated with dietary intervention seeks to deter its transition to type 2 diabetes. However, the study is restricted by a small sample number and its pilot status, which restricts generalizing the findings to other populations of patients. CGM and diet interventions should further be investigated for their long-term effectiveness, ease of implementation for large populations, and differences based on participants’ demographic profiles. Choy, K.Y.C. & Louie, J.C.Y. (2023). The effects of the ketogenic diet for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent studies. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102905. To synthesize findings from different meta-analytic studies that examined the efficacy of ketogenic diet in improving glycemic management and reducing weight in individuals with T2DM. Choy and Louie (2023) use a systematic review and meta-analysis of the recent literature on the ketogenic diet's on management the impact of diabetes. As a great benefit of the method, it essentially combines the quantitative...