HBS Case Study

USWNT vs. USSF Name Institution Course and Code Professor Date USWNT vs. USSF Part A Answer 1 The USSF and USWNT are crucial organizations that enable players to have a collective bargaining, particularly when it entails the terms of their employment and how they are handled by their respective teams. The CBA existed from 2015 to 2019 and was the basis of this relationship. The existence of a CBA is the most crucial factor in this situation, as it states the rights, responsibilities, and remunerations of the players and the federation (Exley et al., 2021). It covers major components, which include wages, working conditions, labor disputes, and other labor relations matters. As a result, the terms codified in the CBA become the basis for the union’s claims and grievances concerning fair compensation (Das, 2022). The CBA plays a fundamental role in interpreting the framework of the deal and the relationships between the parties, which determine the dynamics of the case and the arguments presented by both sides. Answer 2 In 2016, USWNT filed a lawsuit with the EEOC for sexual discrimination, claiming that female players of the team were paid less for similar or better success than the USMNT. Here, the plaintiff elucidates the unfairness when it comes to how female and male players are treated and paid, pointing to the discriminatory aspects, like paid games, dissimilar World Cup and Olympics payments, per diems, and sponsor appearances. In reality, a CBA is crucial to support EEOC complaints because it facilitates employment contract conditions between players and federations. The complaint argues t...