100% (1)
page:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
2
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 29.16
Topic:

Zara: An Integrated Store and Online Model

Case Study Instructions:

Individual Case Analysis: Zara: An Integrated Store and Online Model (A) -2020.

This case study is in the course module.

Grade: This assignment is 30% of your final grade.

Assignment: To prepare for the business challenge and team deliverables you will complete an individual analysis of a case study focused on the retail industry. There are important strategies and applicable concepts in this case study that will help you and your teammates navigate through the business challenge.

Pages: 8 pages max, 12-point Times New Roman font - single-spaced. The page count excludes the cover page, reference page, and appendix.

Attempts: There are only 2 attempts for submission on this assignment. After the second submission, you will not be able to submit it. The last submission will be graded if you submit your assignment twice. No emailed assignments will be accepted.

Case Study Prep: In preparation for this assignment, read the questions below and then skim the case once to get an overview. Afterward, re-read the case more carefully for details so that you can answer the questions completely in detail.

The purpose of the case is to understand the key issues while eliminating any extraneous details. Like real business situations, the cases give you more information than you need. You need to understand what information is relevant for a given context.

Make sure you are not using any outside material to help you with this case. Use only the facts given in this case and the additional reading Blurring the Lines between Physical and Digital Spaces: Business Model Innovation in Retailing by Milan Jocevski. Do not surf the web for outside answers, look at other sources, or share your work/collaborate with other students in the course. This is an independent assignment and as the honor code applies suspected similarity in work will be referred to the Academic Integrity Committee (AIC).

Failure to adhere to APA guidelines will result in an automatic 10-points deduction.

Some of these questions, like in real business situations do not have clear answers but require you to develop a position and argument that can be defended to defend your position. However, there are answers that are better reasoned than other answers.

Make sure that you can FACTUALLY defend your answers using facts from the case.

In marketing, we use quantitative proof if available in the case to make a case. Therefore, cite facts from the case to draw conclusions and recommendations. This means you're required to use APA in-text citation and referencing in your submission. Incorrect APA use or a Turn It In similarity score of 15% or higher will be flagged and reviewed for plagiarism by the Academic Integrity Committee (AIC).

Case Questions:

Compare the profit margins for Zara, Gap, and H&M. What can explain some of the differences?

Should Zara continue to aggregate smaller stores in an urban area into one flagship store (for example, in Bilbao, replacing four stores with one flagship store)? Why or why not?

Under what conditions should Zara fill online orders from stores rather than from online distribution centers (DCs)? That is, what criteria would you use to decide whether you fill an order from an online DC or from a store?

Should Zara replicate the integrated store and online DC model in other markets? Why or why not?

Would you advise Zara’s competitors to invest in similar RFID technology?

THIS QUESTION IS FOR MIM-DD STUDENTS ONLY:

In Change Management, Professor Anthony taught the strategy Force Field Analysis (FFA). Please answer question 2 and then apply (FFA). Since the FFA is a visual please consider it as an appendix.

Please use the link provided to make a FFA visual. You can choose any of the models provided. Once complete please PDF the file. You will add this as an appendix to your paper. This visual should be aligned with your thoughts in the above question: https://online(dot)visual-paradigm(dot)com/diagrams/features/force-field-analysis-template/

PLEASE INCLUDE APPENDIX WITH DATAS! OUR PROFESSOR LOVES GRAPHS AND NUMBERS SO PLEASE INSERT THEM AS AN APPENDIX AT LEAST!

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Zara Case Analysis
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
s
Zara Case Analysis
Zara, a global brand in the fashion industry, is an example of an organization that has advanced market shares due to its understanding of the market and adapting to the required changes. Zara, a subsidiary of Inditex Group, started in 1963 in Coruna (Moreno, 2021). Its operations advanced quickly to the extent of having 9 stores in Spain after 20 years of operations. By 2018, Zara was a notable brand with its parent company operating 7,490 stores in 96 markets (Moreno, 2021). Traditionally, Zara scaled the market leadership ladder through efficiency in lead time management. However, the adoption of e-commerce and online shopping at the height of the technology era has meant that Zara thinks about reorganizing its business model to fit the operational environment. In this analysis, emphasis is put on Zara’s transition through exploring the company’s profit margins relative to competitors, assessment of store aggregation, and advancements of RFID technologies in its supply chain.
Comparing the Profit Margins
Zara’s market position can easily be explored using its profitability data relative to close competitors such as Gap and H&M. in the financial year 2018, Zara had revenues of more than $26 billion. That number was high compared to H&M’s $21 billion, and Gap’s $15 billion. According to Moreno (2021), the total net income in the same financial year was $3.448 billion for Zara, $1.709 billion for H&M, and $848 million for Gap. Also worth noting is that at the time, Zara had a total of 7,490 stores compared to H&M’s 4,739 and 3,594 stores Gap. At the same time, Zara’s return on capital employed (ROCE) was higher than the competitors’ at 24% relative to H&M’s 19.3% and Gap’s 20.9% (Moreno, 2021).
Based on the above data, it is there can be multiple reasons drawn to explain Zara’s exemplary performance relative to the competitors’. First is the business model that Zara has exploited through its tradition: lead time management. Zara was able to run with modest, quickly moving shop inventory thanks to its quick filling of store orders. Stores sent information on the products to the corporate office, including order and sales data, customer feedback, and predictions of future trends. According to the information and anecdotal reports, store managers transmitted orders to the corporate office 2 times a week, and the goods arrived in the store within 2 days (Moreno, 2021). The merchandise would subsequently be displayed on the shop floor to the satisfaction of customers. Zara’s inventory management model was different from competitors such as Gap and H&M. Gap, for instance, had an average production cycle of 10 months, which is too long for an industry that changes quickly (Moreno, 2021).
The second reason why Zara’s profitability is high is the company’s sales strategy. In 2010, Zara, strategically, launched Zara online, which has contributed significantly to the company’s sales growth. The launch of zara.com triggered the development of online distribution centers. By 2018, Zara had physical stores in 96 markets as opposed to its 156 markets served by online operations (Moreno, 2021). Additionally, by 2018, the number of countries in which one can access Zara products had increased to 202. At the same time, online sales were growing steadily for Zara (Moreno, 2021). There was a 27% growth in online sales from the 2010 data leading to a 12% contribution of online sales to the total sales. Zara’s smooth integration of online operations into its physical store chains increased its profits relative to competitors.
Zara has also showcased steady growth in its sales indices. The evolution of revenues at Inditex brands shows that Zara has showcased a steady growth in sales, something that the competitors have failed to match. In 2018, the number of new sales had grown to $26,145 million from $25,336 in the previous year (Moreno, 2021). The growth in the 2017/18 financial year stood at 4%. The trends of new sales have been positive for Zara since 2014 with its highest peak grossing at a 10% growth index in 2016 (Moreno, 2021). A high growth rate for Zara in new sales implies steady profitability, for an organization with swift lead-time management if compared to the competitors.
Ultimately, Zara bears better interactions with consumers compared to its competitors. Part of the reason why Zara is more profitable is its motivation to achieve the best sales in every operational environment. Throughout its life, Zara has worked to improve the number of people who can access its products. In 2014, Zara operated in 88 markets with all those markets having stores for a total number of 6,683 stores (Moreno, 2021). That number has since grown considerably with the company operating in 202 markets in 2018, 96 markets with stores, a total of 7,490 stores with 156 of the 202 operational markets having online sales. The numbers recorded by Zara are high relative to comp...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Sign In
Not register? Register Now!