Citigroup's Internal Controls
Week 4 Assignment - Case Study on Audit and Internal Control
Overview
In the United States, the management and auditors of publicly held companies must evaluate their internal controls annually. The purpose of the evaluation is to look for any control deficiencies. Doing so will help avoid any penalties such as the $10.5 million that the SEC imposed on Citigroup Inc. as a result of its internal controls failures. See the article from SEC.gov, Citigroup to Pay More Than $10 Million for Books and Records Violations and Inadequate Controls.
You are an external auditor hired by Citigroup to perform an audit. You will be reporting to Citigroup’s audit committee.
Instructions
Write a 2–3 page report for the audit committee in which you:
Critique Citigroup’s internal controls and the purpose they serve.
Distinguish between operation and design control deficiency.
Determine the reasons that led Citigroup Inc. to pay $10.5 million in penalties.
Recommend techniques that will overcome the weaknesses of Citigroup’s internal controls; justify the recommendation.
Use three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment.
Critique Citigroup's Internal Controls
Student's Name
Instructor's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Date of Submission
Critique Citigroup's Internal Controls
Internal controls are the mechanisms and procedures developed in a company to ensure integrity in all internal accounting procedures. The main purposes of implementing internal controls are to avoid fraud that could lead to the collapse of a company. Internal controls protect a company from fraudulent activities that customers and insiders could conduct. Some fraudulent activities that could happen include overpricing, overpaying, and undercharging or overcharging for services provided. According to Henk (2020), the main purpose of internal controls is not to prevent losses but to ensure early detection of fraud and to reduce risks that could lead to losses.
Operation and Design Control Deficiencies
According to AIPCA (2017), operation control deficiency is a weakness that results from human errors. In most cases, operation control deficiency could result from ignorance or intentions to defraud a company through inappropriate practices. Operational control deficiency occurs when employees fail to adhere to the ethics code and end up operating in ways that are not in line with the policies. In most cases, employees might tamper with systems that could detect such mistakes to ensure there are no recorded incidents of errors. Such deficiencies become costly to organizations because they affect the overall outcome and are not easily noticeable from the record statements.
Consequently, design control deficiency occurs due to faulty systems that do not allow straightforward operations (AIPCA, 2017). For instance, there might be systems that do not allow employees to rectify mistakes due to human error. If the mistakes are uncorrected, they result in more detrimental impacts to the company, yet there could be a solution by correcting the mistakes. Other systems might deny employees the chance to detect and prevent misstatements before the process advances.
Reasons that Led Citigroup Inc. to Pay $1...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Accounting for Contingent Assets: The Case of Cardinal Health
2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Accounting, Finance, SPSS | Case Study |
-
Bluntly Media: A Private Company Valuation
1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Accounting, Finance, SPSS | Case Study |
-
DuPont Corporation: Sale of Performance Coatings
2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Accounting, Finance, SPSS | Case Study |