Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
-1
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Book Review
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 23.76
Topic:
Anthropology Article Review: Autism and Neurodiversity, Education, and Social Stress
Book Review Instructions:
The article review needs to include three parts: (1)outline of the main points discussed in the article; (2) evidence the author(s) are using in developing their argument; and (3) a brief discussion on the ideas presented in the article, which needs to include your take on the argument presented in the reading. In the last part –your take on the article --you can connect the topic with other things you have read, evaluate strengths/weaknesses of the author’s views, or offer a different interpretation of evidences presented in the reading. The writing assignments should be short and to the point(at least 2 pages; double-spaced). You are not expected to use outside sources, but you can if you want to.
Please write three different article reviews, and you can choose any three from the files uploaded, 2 pages for each articles, thanks.
Book Review Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
Anthropology article review
Article 1
The article “Deficit, Difference, or Both Autism and Neurodiversity” by Kapp et al. (2012) explains that autistic individuals struggle with matters related to challenges associated with being autistic where the people are likely to see the difference with other people as a lonely experience because they do not belong. Additionally, the authors explain that autistic self-advocates in autism rights and neurodiversity. This article focuses on examining and evaluating how the awareness of neurodiversity and connection to autism is associated with the three means of responding to autism: elimination, amelioration, and celebration. The authors have asserted that framing people with these conditions as being sick or having reduced capacity helps in granting and presenting people with the ability to make care decisions (Kapp, p.2). Therefore, parents with autistic children are therefore able to facilitate effective treatment with intentions for the cure.
Furthermore, the article explains that neurodiversity encourages subjective well-being and adaptive and does not focus on functioning. Besides, the neurodiversity advocates are against interventions that e aimed at eliminating behaviors that may be considered uncommon and harmless such as repetitive body movements and other common features such as avoiding eye contact. Additionally, there are different reactions to sociopolitical change associated with the neurodiversity movement. For instance, there has been opposition regarding the measures implemented to ameliorate the defects linked to autism (Kapp, p.2-3). Further, there are differences that exist in research aims, and medical studies and individuals with autism have called for research and studies that addressed their interests. The authors have supported the need for research supported by the autistic persons’ views indicating that learning about neurodiversity can be a turning point towards the beginning of the holistic formulation of autism. The authors further indicate that having research focused on neurodiversity would benefit autistic individuals and their parents because it would make them feel strengthened about the associated disability and become supporters of the movement.
Certainly, better and informed research studies would indeed facilitate awareness because this would make it possible to facilitate impression and concept regarding the positive aspects linked to autism; however, this cannot reduce the negative views promoted by autistic self-advocates. Moreover, neurodiversity awareness may indeed help in facilitating positive and better changes for autistic individuals. This is possible since the negative emotions may become less visible and receptive. Besides, this would also help in encouraging and promoting better parenting practices; it can encourage parents and family members to focus on acceptable goals and effective intervening methods. Further, disability is socially constructed; this perspective would make autistic people see their brain as an obstacle that prevents them from gaining the needed social acceptance. However, undertaking neurodiversity realization and understand may help people to comprehend the neurological basis of the challenges faced by autistic individuals. Educating autistic individuals and their parents may help them see the condition as a positive identity. This can help integrate the social and medical standpoint and may help affected people cope; this would also help reduce stigmatization.
Article 2
The article “Outcome-Based Tyranny: Teaching Compliance While Testing like a State” by David H. Price explains that the anthropological researches undertake in the last century has been critical in challenging issues such as racial, gender, and ethnic bias in American society. The author has emphasized that anthropology’s most contribution during the twentieth century was to deconstruct the views linking race and ethnicity to intelligence. Additionally, the author has explained how some of the 1900s anthropologists such as Franz Boas have condemned and attack the discriminatory intelligence tests and have also criticized the application of standardized tests results in different areas of society such as in education, immigration, and some careers such as law enforcement (Price, p.715). Additionally, anthropologists such as Otto Klineberg has denounced the application of the biased Intelligence quotient (I.Q.) tests that are based on cultural participation and do not consider innate intelligence.
Furthermore, the article explains the contributions that other anthropologists have made that include publishing resources to educate members of the public. For instance, Ashley Montagu and Marvin Harris have written articles and books informing people about the dangers associated with the use of standardized I.Q tests to identify and group people in different meaningful ways. It is critical to note that the author has effectively explained why these tests are unsuitable. Price indicates that the tests do not effective...
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
Anthropology article review
Article 1
The article “Deficit, Difference, or Both Autism and Neurodiversity” by Kapp et al. (2012) explains that autistic individuals struggle with matters related to challenges associated with being autistic where the people are likely to see the difference with other people as a lonely experience because they do not belong. Additionally, the authors explain that autistic self-advocates in autism rights and neurodiversity. This article focuses on examining and evaluating how the awareness of neurodiversity and connection to autism is associated with the three means of responding to autism: elimination, amelioration, and celebration. The authors have asserted that framing people with these conditions as being sick or having reduced capacity helps in granting and presenting people with the ability to make care decisions (Kapp, p.2). Therefore, parents with autistic children are therefore able to facilitate effective treatment with intentions for the cure.
Furthermore, the article explains that neurodiversity encourages subjective well-being and adaptive and does not focus on functioning. Besides, the neurodiversity advocates are against interventions that e aimed at eliminating behaviors that may be considered uncommon and harmless such as repetitive body movements and other common features such as avoiding eye contact. Additionally, there are different reactions to sociopolitical change associated with the neurodiversity movement. For instance, there has been opposition regarding the measures implemented to ameliorate the defects linked to autism (Kapp, p.2-3). Further, there are differences that exist in research aims, and medical studies and individuals with autism have called for research and studies that addressed their interests. The authors have supported the need for research supported by the autistic persons’ views indicating that learning about neurodiversity can be a turning point towards the beginning of the holistic formulation of autism. The authors further indicate that having research focused on neurodiversity would benefit autistic individuals and their parents because it would make them feel strengthened about the associated disability and become supporters of the movement.
Certainly, better and informed research studies would indeed facilitate awareness because this would make it possible to facilitate impression and concept regarding the positive aspects linked to autism; however, this cannot reduce the negative views promoted by autistic self-advocates. Moreover, neurodiversity awareness may indeed help in facilitating positive and better changes for autistic individuals. This is possible since the negative emotions may become less visible and receptive. Besides, this would also help in encouraging and promoting better parenting practices; it can encourage parents and family members to focus on acceptable goals and effective intervening methods. Further, disability is socially constructed; this perspective would make autistic people see their brain as an obstacle that prevents them from gaining the needed social acceptance. However, undertaking neurodiversity realization and understand may help people to comprehend the neurological basis of the challenges faced by autistic individuals. Educating autistic individuals and their parents may help them see the condition as a positive identity. This can help integrate the social and medical standpoint and may help affected people cope; this would also help reduce stigmatization.
Article 2
The article “Outcome-Based Tyranny: Teaching Compliance While Testing like a State” by David H. Price explains that the anthropological researches undertake in the last century has been critical in challenging issues such as racial, gender, and ethnic bias in American society. The author has emphasized that anthropology’s most contribution during the twentieth century was to deconstruct the views linking race and ethnicity to intelligence. Additionally, the author has explained how some of the 1900s anthropologists such as Franz Boas have condemned and attack the discriminatory intelligence tests and have also criticized the application of standardized tests results in different areas of society such as in education, immigration, and some careers such as law enforcement (Price, p.715). Additionally, anthropologists such as Otto Klineberg has denounced the application of the biased Intelligence quotient (I.Q.) tests that are based on cultural participation and do not consider innate intelligence.
Furthermore, the article explains the contributions that other anthropologists have made that include publishing resources to educate members of the public. For instance, Ashley Montagu and Marvin Harris have written articles and books informing people about the dangers associated with the use of standardized I.Q tests to identify and group people in different meaningful ways. It is critical to note that the author has effectively explained why these tests are unsuitable. Price indicates that the tests do not effective...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now: