Decision-making related article. Article Critique.
This will consist of a written article summary/critique (with a minimum [maximum] 3 [4] singlespaced pages using type-12 font and 1-inch margins throughout). The scope of the written review must include
the following:
i. Complete journal reference information. Note: this should be part of the cover page, and thus does
not count as part of the 4 pages of the summary/critique.
Page 6 of 15
ii. A clear summary of the research problem, rationale (i.e., why is this worthy of study?), and
objectives.
iii. A summary of the conceptual development of the paper (the development of theory) and of the
corresponding research hypotheses/propositions and/or theoretical model.
iv. A synopsis of research methodology employed, and analytical approaches.
v. A rundown and interpretation of the major findings, and conclusions (including the main theoretical
and practical implications).
vi. A thorough critique of the conceptual (e.g., key contributions) and methodological (e.g., anything
new/interesting, major flaws and/or shortcomings) aspects of the research. Students must include
their own ideas here.
vii. Some very specific recommendations for future research under the theme of the research topic.
Students must include their own ideas here.
As a general guideline, the length of the written assignment should be about 60-70% summary
(points i. through v.), and 30-40% critique (points vi. and vii.). Students may choose to integrate
both summary and critique components, or write them sequentially (that is, keep them in separate
sections). Please ensure that your work is entirely original: avoid plagiarism. Paraphrase (put into
your own words), use proper citation methods (where applicable), and rely on your own thoughts.
Papers may be checked for originality using turnitin.com
The critique part of the assignments might include some of the following points (this list
is not exhaustive):
How important is this research (timeliness, relevance, applicability, scope)?
How convincing is/are the argument(s) presented (that is, the main theory being advanced by the
author[s]?
Does the review of the existing literature appear adequate; are key terms/concepts/models
adequately explained?
How clearly are the hypotheses stated? Are they stated in a way in which the findings will lead
to acceptance or rejection of the hypotheses or are the hypotheses ambiguously phrased?
Are there any biases in the methodology (scope, experimental manipulations, survey, sample
subjects, etc.)? To what extent could these methodological weaknesses compromise the findings
of the study (and if so, did the author[s] disclose these limitations in the article)? Some examples
of weaknesses are as follows:
An experiment with unbalanced groups (which may account for differences observed, beyond
the experimental manipulation).
A poorly-worded questionnaire. Unreasonable questions or prone to biased answers?
A study comparing different ethnic/cultural groups, without taking into account differences in
the interpretation of questionnaire items.
A contrived experimental situation that is unrealistic, and therefore, lacking external validity.
Attempting to generalize findings from student samples to the broader population, etc.
Evaluation of the adequacy of the evidence presented to support the author(s)’ claims? In other
words, how reasonable are the conclusions based on the theory and associated findings (this
usually appears in the “Discussion” part of the paper)? If you disagree with some of the conclusions,
point out these problems or suggest alterative explanations.
Clarity and logic of the author(s)’ reasoning, style of writing? Are there any contradictions in
reasoning, or areas of ambiguity, that appear in the article?
Anything else relevant, your subjective evaluation (What did you like/dislike about the paper? What
linkages may exist between the theories and variables discussed in this paper and in other papers?)
Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition Emotion and Motivation
By Markus & Kitayama,
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Culture and Self: Implications for Emotion, Cognition and Motivation
1 Summary of Research Rationale
People who belong to different values have dissimilar construals of self, interdependence, and others. This may influence and determine some of the cases with individual experience which includes emotion, cognition, and motivation. Numerous Asian Values have the outsets towards independence that maintain an understanding of characters. American values neither undertake nor standards such as connectedness amongst the characters. An individual may pursue to preserve their individuality from others by joining to the self and stating their qualities internally (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). Concentrating on the alterations in self-construals allows the results of the research, which raises questions related to cognition, motivation, and emotion.
1.1 Problem
To begin with the discussion there are some common problems and issues that are identified in the research so that all the participants would meet. The analysis conducted was relevant to central problems in western psychology and the discrepancy amongst the behavior and attitudes. As noted symbiotic selves may not recommend or necessitate the constancy amongst one's action and attributes (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). The use of the reports that are introspective which is quite valuable in the learning towards emotion, cognition, and motivation which is difficult in the cross-cultural investigation as it is given within cultural background. People may have entree to the absolute amount of consideration and receptiveness towards others.
1.2 Objectives
In the recent study which was related to ethical reasoning found that Indians respect receptiveness to the wants of others was the main objective of moral responsibility to the far range other than Americans. Though the self-systems of the persons from the cultures are dissimilar as they seem to be alike in the superior value that is devoted to the correct relation and in the obligation to adjust one's presentation following the nature of the connection. Even in the American values, there is a main and tough refrain of interdependence which is shown towards the activities and values of many other subgroups. Religious assemblies may promote interdependence towards rural communities and small towns.
2.0 Summary of Conceptual Development
Many cultures in Asia have the conceptions of independence that may maintain the understanding of individuals (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). The emphasis is on presence, fitting in and symphonic interdependence with them. Philosophy in America neither undertake nor beliefs such as unconcealed connectedness amongst the persons.
The self can be interpreted and theoretically shown in different ways. A cross-cultural study of the self may sustenance the early idea that contains the grouping of the self which is fundamentally the social factors or the product and claim that the social category and self is the subject which is not an infinite and substantial variation. According to the table, it may highlight the conceptual representation of the self with the summary of some differences which is hypothesized between self-determining and symbiotic personality’s construal. These construals of personality and others are abstracted as a portion of the range of self-relevant schemes recycled to establish and evaluate one action and involvement (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). As per the scheme, there are patterns of one’s behavior as well as the designs of future behavior.
The western and the independent opinion of the personality is highlighted in the figure. The great circle shows the personality and small circles may highlight precise others. Xs is the representation of some of the features of the self or others. In certain situations, small and large circles interconnect and there is an X in the connection. This may refer to the picture of the self-concerning others or is specific to the common relation. An X within the self-circle but outdoor the connection shows the feature of the self which is perceived towards self-governing of particular different invariant over time and the context. This representation of the self-have refers to the desire, ability, and preference of an individual.
2.1 Summary of Corresponding Research Hypothesis
Carrying and conducting the research which is essential to examine the variety of the penalties of having one or additional construal of the personality raises of the queries that are complex. Some of them have been touched only (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). For example, the issue is persistent that how deep and universal are the alterations in the culture? Are the differences observed mainly with the reflection that highlights the changes in styles of the appearance-related to behavior? They may also reproduce the differences in the phenomenology that may accompany the performance? There are some standards which are against the expression and display of annoyance, what occurs to the nature of the anger which is felt? In other words, it is suggested that these standards can be assumed to some extent and it control the nature of one’s involvement. The researchers have asked the respondents that may designate how pleasant it would be to involve in the time incontrollable and the behavior which is costly such as staying the friend to see in the hospital (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). Only in the condition of the public the person can claim that the behavior would be different and pleasant. The collectivist may claim that the behavior would be pleasant when their answers were isolated.
3.0 Research Methodology
Some of the people may give punishment to the child for the behavior which is immoral thereby it may lead towards the consequences of such kind of behavior. Others may give rewards to a child for the moral behavior which may lead towards morally. Both methods may be lead towards respect for a child’s ethics. The first technique may lead to the negative significances of psychology as it may minor the self-esteem of the child. There are two common methods. The second method would be better which shows that may the method works and how it is used in combination with each other or why particular other stated resources are desirable. For some of the subjects, there was an evident to interview as it may not highlight the paragraph which states that both the method may lead towards the child to esteem the morality they handled to select the substitute as it may mislead since the experience was untrue (Markus and Kitayama, 1991). It was expected that the answer may reflect the personal opinion which is considered if not there was an explanation which was elaborated on the experience which is relevant to the matter on the hand.
3.1 Analytical Approaches
After looking at the methodology monoculture approach was towards the self, the psychologist may understand the phenomena which are connected with one way or alternative to the personality which may be constrained. In this article the construals of the personality and others with the association amongst self and others which is more commanding. It clearly shows the differences between cultures. The comparison w...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:
-
Border Security and Trade Policy Review Literature Article Critique
2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Article Critique |
-
Chad Davis. Literature & Language. Article Critique
1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Article Critique |
-
A Disjuncture between Educational Policy and Scientific Research
2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Article Critique |