Essay Available:

100% (1)

page:

3 pages/≈825 words

Sources:

-1

Style:

APA

Subject:

Communications & Media

Type:

Annotated Bibliography

Language:

English (U.S.)

Document:

MS Word

Date:

2020-07-05

Total cost:

$ 11.88

Topic:

Annotated Bibliography Communications & Media Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography Instructions:

Outline and further information

You are required to produce an annotated bibliography of three academic texts, one text will be assigned by the tutor, and the other two will be sourced by you. It will be 250 words per annotation (750 words total), +-10%). An annotated bibliography involves summarising and making a critical evaluation of scholarly texts.

I've given you three readings

Annotated Bilbliography

Annotated Bilbliography

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRelevance, quality, reliability and currency of texts

25.0 Pts

Weighting criteria

Not available to choose

23.06 Pts

Texts chosen are highly relevant to the topic/subject and add greatly to assignment potential. All texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. All texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

19.87 Pts

All texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject.All texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

17.37 Pts

All texts are interesting and clearly related to topic/subject. Most texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject.Most texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

14.25 Pts

Most texts cover topic/subject, but they are less interesting and the relationship to topic/subject is less clear. Most texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. Most texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

11.75 Pts

Texts are uninspiring and relationship to topic/subject is unclear. Few texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. Few texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

9.25 Pts

Few texts are relevant to the topic/subject; may require significant additional research. No texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. No texts can be considered reliable and/or trustworthy.

3.69 Pts

Texts are not relevant to researcher’s topic; texts necessitate extensive additional research. No texts are published within the correct timeframe for topic/subject. No reliable and/or trustworthy texts cited.

0.0 Pts

No supporting evidence.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDepth of comprehension and critical analysis

25.0 Pts

Criteria weighting

Not available to choose

23.06 Pts

Annotations reflect a deep critical, analytical understanding of texts in the detailed & thoughtful evaluation of each one.

19.87 Pts

Annotations generally reflect a critical, analytical understanding of the texts but is uneven. Some detailed evaluation however there is a lack of interrogation of the texts.

17.37 Pts

Annotations demonstrate basic comprehension of texts but not a critical, analytical understanding of it. Some evaluation however few comments are ‘quotes’ or paraphrases rather than evaluation of each text.

14.25 Pts

Annotations demonstrate some awareness of text details but not a critical, analytical understanding of texts; points made are vague and unsubstantiated. Few descriptive ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

11.75 Pts

Annotations demonstrate limited awareness of text details and no critical, analytical understanding of texts. Some descriptive ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

9.25 Pts

Very limited evaluative comment included and no awareness of text detail. Most descriptive ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

3.69 Pts

No evaluative comment included and no awareness of text detail. Annotations are a collection of ‘quotes’ or paraphrases.

0.0 Pts

No supporting evidence.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeElements of annotated bibliography

20.0 Pts

Criteria weighting

Not available to choose

18.45 Pts

All elements of the annotations are present & there is an accurate detailed descriptions of each text in a clear & consistent, succinct manner.

15.9 Pts

All elements of the annotations are present & accurately recorded in succinct detail highlighting the key points in each text.

13.9 Pts

Key elements of the annotations are present & accurate, but may lack some detail.

11.4 Pts

Key elements of the annotations are present & mainly accurate.

9.4 Pts

1 or 2 key elements of the annotations are missing and other elements lack some detail.

7.4 Pts

3 or more key elements of the annotations are missing and other elements are mainly inaccurate.

2.95 Pts

All key elements of the annotations are missing and other elements are inaccurate. Submission does not classify as an annotation.

0.0 Pts

No supporting evidence.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClarity and fluency of written expression

15.0 Pts

Criteria weighting

Not available to choose

13.84 Pts

Writing demonstrates exceptionally strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Minor need for editing.

11.92 Pts

Writing demonstrates strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Minor need for editing.

10.42 Pts

Writing demonstrates control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Some need for editing.

8.55 Pts

7.05 Pts

Writing demonstrates limited control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Substantial need for editing.

5.55 Pts

Numerous errors in usage, spelling, capitalisation, and punctuation make the text difficult to read. Severity and frequency of errors make it difficult to focus on the message and must reread for meaning. Need for extensive editing.

2.21 Pts

Extensive errors in usage, spelling, capitalisation, and punctuation make the text extremely difficult to read. Reader cannot understand the message due to severity and frequency of errors. Need for re-writing.

0.0 Pts

No supporting evidence.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAccuracy of bibliographic citation in APA style

15.0 Pts

Criteria weighting

Not available to choose

13.84 Pts

Complete citation with ALL elements of APA style in the correct format and order.

11.92 Pts

Complete citation with ALL elements of APA style, most in the correct format and order.

10.42 Pts

Complete citation with ALL elements of APA style, few in the correct format and order.

8.55 Pts

Contains all KEY elements of APA style in the correct format and order.

7.05 Pts

Contains most KEY elements of APA style, few in the correct format and order.

5.55 Pts

Contains SOME elements of APA style, most in the correct format and order.

2.21 Pts

Contains FEW elements of APA style, few in the correct format and order.

0.0 Pts

No supporting evidence.

15.0 pts

Total points: 100.0

CDIC001 - Digital Communities

Assessment Task 2 Brief - Annotated Bibliography

Aim of task 2

For you to identify key theoretical approaches to digitally mediates groups, critically discuss relevant concepts and produce evaluative summaries of scholarly texts.

ASSESSMENT TASK 2

WEIGHT

OUTCOMES

DUE

Annotated Bibliography

20%

a and d

Online Submission via Canvas, Week 4 Friday 23:59

Outline and further information

You are required to produce an annotated bibliography of three academic texts, one text will be assigned by the tutor, and the other two will be sourced by you. It will be 250 words per annotation (750 words total), +-10%). An annotated bibliography involves summarising and making a critical evaluation of scholarly texts.

	CRITERIA	WEIGHT	SLOs	PLOs
1	Relevance, quality, reliability and currency of texts	25%	a	A1
2	Depth of comprehension and critical analysis	25%	a	A1 B2
3	Elements of annotated bibliography: Full bibliographic citation Introduction Identifies the aim and/or main argument of text Points out in in what way the reading relates to themes or concepts in subject States strengths and/or limitations of the text (critical analysis) Identifies any conclusions made by the author	20%	a	A1 B2
4	Clarity and fluency of written expression	15%	d	C1 E1
5	Accuracy of bibliographic citation/reference in APA Style	15%	d	E1

MORE INFORMATION

What is the assigned text? Where can I find it?

The assigned text is: Baym, Nancy 2010, 'Communities and Networks (Chapter 4)' in Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Cambridge, Polity Press, pp.106-139. Via 2-hour loan in Library Open Reserve or https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/drr/43249/

Where can I find other texts to write my annotated bibliography?

http://www.lib.uts.edu.au

https://scholar.google.com.au

How do I avoid plagiarism?

https://avoidingplagiarism.uts.edu.au

Academic misconduct and dishonesty will not be tolerated and penalties will apply.

Can I add more than three texts to the annotated bibliography?

NO. You are required to write an annotated bibliography of three text, no more, no less.

Annotated Bibliography Sample Content Preview:

Annotated Bibliography
Name
Institution
Course
Date
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brunswicker, S., Matei, S. A., Zentner, M., Zentner, L., & Klimeck, G. (2017). Creating impact in the digital space: digital practice dependency in communities of digital scientific innovations. Scientometrics, 110(1), 417-442.
In this article, the authors have presented an argument on the importance of digital space. According to this article, modern science has become digital. The internet has had a lot of benefits because it has supported the development of digital performs and programs that can be able to connect people globally. The authors assert that it is very important for individuals to understand the significance of digital technologies. This article has provided comprehensive research on the importance of digital technologies. According to Brunswicker, Matei, Zentner, Zentner & Klimeck (2017), scientists can develop digital platforms that can establish collaborative relationships outside the traditional realm. The authors have given an example of a well-known platform nanoHUB which has more than 300,000 users who have been registered. This is a platform that gives gamers a better way of creating interactive scientific applications via the API. In this article, there is a research question that has guided the authors throughout the research. This research question is; to what extent is a programmer’s scientific impact dependent upon the digital community-level work structure, the digital practice structure? This question is very important because it has assisted the authors to ascertain how scientific programmers have an impact on the digital community. Various concepts like digital practice structure have been introduced in the article. This article is important because it has offered insights into the impact of digital space on the online community. Additionally, the authors have also highlighted that more research is very important to understand the complete impact of digital space. However, this article is not conclusive enough to form a majority of one's understanding of online communities.
Ormerod, P. (1999). Digital communities of interest. Business information review, 16(3), 137-142.
In this article, Ormerod has discussed the significance of online communities when it comes to different professions. Additionally, the author has identified different ways of establishing different online communities and how these communities can be cultivated. Th...

Updated on January 26, 2024

Get the Whole Paper!

Not exactly what you need?

Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

Major: Annotated Bibliography. Communications & Media

1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Communications & Media | Annotated Bibliography |
Using Avatars on the Videoconferencing Platform to Hide Identities

3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | APA | Communications & Media | Annotated Bibliography |
Media Exposure and Effects

1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Communications & Media | Annotated Bibliography |